Anonymous ID: 02a817 March 5, 2023, 5:31 a.m. No.18450071   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0573

 

Furious families of Manchester Arena bombing victims to sue MI5

By Duncan Gardham and Abul Taher 18:01 EST 04 Mar 2023

 

The families of the Manchester Arena bombing victims intend to sue over a catalogue of failures, including a missed ‘significant opportunity’ to stop the attacker days before the deadly atrocity.

 

Last week, an official inquiry told how MI5 had Arenabomber Salman Abedi on its radar from 2010, but regarded him as low priority.

 

However, in the months before the attack – which killed 22 victims, mainly children –MI5 received two vital pieces of intelligence on Abedi, which it failed to act upon quickly.

 

Had it done so, its spies may have stopped the attack by watching him more closely.

 

Andrew Roussos, whose daughter Saffie-Rose, eight, was the youngest victim, said it could not be ‘business as usual’ for MI5 after the inquiry’s final report came out last week.

 

Saffie-Rose Roussos was the youngest person to diein the Manchester Arena bombing

After it was highly critical of MI5, its Director-General, Ken McCallum, apologised to the victims’ families.

 

Mr Roussos said: ‘I would like to sue MI5 and I know other families feel the same way. I can’t see why not. If they get sued it will make sure it is not business as usual.

 

‘I have said from day one that I blame MI5 – the country’s Security Service. But now there is clear evidence that they messed up, and there has to be a price to pay. They need to feel responsible.’

 

He said four law firms were considering how best to sue MI5, adding: ‘Taking civil action is the only way to make sure they have a real incentive to learn lessons.’

 

Caroline Curry, whose son Liam, 19, died at the concert with his girlfriend Chloe Rutherford, 17, also wants to sue MI5 for negligence.

 

She said: ‘It sometimes feels MI5 are untouchable, and I feel it would make sure they do the right thing in future. Others feel the same.’

 

Speaking after the final report of the inquiry was published on Thursday, an angry Ms Curry said: ‘From top to bottom, MI5 to the associates of the attacker, we will always believe you all played a part in the murder of our children.

 

‘Forgiveness will never be an option for such evil intentions, and those that played any part in the murder of our children will never, ever get forgiveness. Shame on you all.’ Thursday’s report looked specifically at Abedi’s radicalisation, what MI5 and counter-terror police knew about him and whether they could have prevented the bombing by acting on intelligence they had.

 

After it was highly critical of MI5, its Director-General, Ken McCallum, apologised to the victims’ families

Abedi, 22, blew himself up at the Manchester Arena after an Ariana Grande concert on May 22, 2017. Mr Roussos said investigations into the 7/7 attack on the LondonUnderground in July 2005, which killed 52 people, also revealed failures by MI5,which had its ringleader, Mohammed Siddique Khan, under surveillance 17 months beforehand. He believes similar mistakes were made in Manchester.

 

Inquiry chairman Sir John Saunders revealed last week thatMI5 received information about Abedi on 20 occasionsbetween 2010 and the days leading up to the attack in May 2017. It came from Abedi’s contacts with known extremists.

 

But MI5 did not investigate him closely. Crucially, Sir John said MI5 received two significant pieces of information of national security concern about Abedi in the months before his attack when he was amassing bomb material.

 

But the two pieces of intelligence – which Sir John could not reveal –were not acted upon by MI5 quickly enough.

 

Abedi was in Libya for a month and returned to Britain four days before the attack. Sir John believes it was in Libya that he was trained how to make a bomb and even brought back a detonator switch.

 

Had MI5 acted on the two pieces of intelligence, he would have been searched on re-entering the UK, and officers would have tailed him, which would have led them to a car full of bomb-making materials.

 

Sir John said there was a ‘realistic possibility’ that ‘actionable intelligence’ could have been obtained that might have prevented the attack, adding: ‘The reasons for this significant missed opportunity included a failure by a Security Service officer to act swiftly.’

 

The Home Office declined to comment on the proposed lawsuit.

 

(This was that Ariana Grande Concert)

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11821385/Furious-families-Manchester-Arena-bombing-victims-sue-MI5.html

Anonymous ID: 02a817 March 5, 2023, 5:47 a.m. No.18450112   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0573

Ministers in clash as farmers fear Britain will be flooded with cheap Mexican and Canadian

By Claire Ellicott Acting Deputy Political Editor For The Mail On Sunday 19:35 EST 04 Mar 2023

 

Ministers are at war over fears that a new trade deal could allow and to flood the UK with cheap beef and pork, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

 

As talks go down to the wire, Environment Secretary is said to be pushing to limit their quotas to protect British farmers.

 

But Government sources close to the talks, led by Trade Secretary , insist the country will not lower its food standards.

The UK is expected within days to reach an agreement in principle to join the .

 

The issue of access to the UK beef and pork markets is understood to be one of the key issues still under negotiation. Talks with the 11-nation bloc – whose members also include New Zealand, Australia, Singapore, Japan, Chile, Vietnam and Malaysia – have been going on since 2021.

 

Concerns were raised initially overCanada’s bid to get Britain to drop a ban on hormone-treated beef– but UK Ministers have insisted this will not happen.

 

However, there has also been apush from Canada and Mexicofor access to Britain’s agricultural market, specifically beef and pork.

 

They are understood to want the same terms as those granted to Australia and New Zealand in their own trade deals with the UK – where tariffs on beef and sheep meat will be phased out and quotas on the quantities they can send will rise in the next ten to 15 years.

 

But there are concerns thatlower animal welfare standardsin countries in the Trans-Pacific trade bloc mean members will be able to undercut UK farmers if they are allowed high quotas.

 

According to sources, Ms Coffey is said to be ‘fighting for the farmers’ and has made her position on access clear. Another Government insider close to the talks said: ‘We will not sign a deal that forces the UK to lower our food standards in any area whatsoever.

 

‘Meanwhile,joining CPTPPmeans 99 per cent of UK goods exports will be eligible for tariff-free trade to a market of 500 million new customers. We’re rightly told by our farmers that they have the best produce in the world – so go sell it to the world and thrive!’

 

The Mail on Sunday has campaigned forprotections against poor-quality foreign food– and to save British farms from being put out of business by cheap imports.

 

National Farming Union (NFU) President Minette Batters has said thatshe is now ‘really wary’ of the Government’s approach to trade in wake of the deal with Australia and New Zealand.

 

She said thatfarmers were seen as an ‘inconvenience’ to UK trade policyand were ‘sacrificed’ in favour of the services sector in Britain’s first post-Brexit deals.

 

Former Environment Secretary George Eustice is among those who have argued that theUK’s deal with Australia is bad for farmers.

 

As a result, Ms Batters said she was watching negotiations on the future Trans-Pacific deal like a ‘hawk’ after arguing thatagriculture was sacrificed on the back of the service sectorin the Australia and New Zealand trade deals.

 

She said yesterday that Rishi Sunak had signalled during the leadership race that he would tread carefully when it came to trade deals. She added she hoped he would continue this approach in Government. But of previous trade deals, she said: ‘You can’t be under any illusions as tothe damage already done.’

 

During his first attempt at becoming Prime Minister last year, Mr Sunak described the deals as a ‘one-sided’ agreement.

 

However, he has described the Trans-Pacific deal as a ‘fantastic’ opportunity for the country. If the UK were to join, it would account for 16 per cent of the world’s GDP.

 

Ms Badenoch has previously said: ‘No matter how nice the deal is, there will always be a group of people who see it as a zero-sum game, and “we’ve got something that they haven’t got”.

 

She added that improving the message on how trade is good for farming is ‘one of the challenges that I need to tackle and help them feel more reassured.’

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11821679/Ministers-clash-farmers-fear-Britain-flooded-cheap-Mexican-Canadian.html

Anonymous ID: 02a817 March 5, 2023, 6:19 a.m. No.18450220   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0238 >>0449 >>0573

'Can we lock him up?' Matt Hancock's team considered action against Nigel Farage

By Elizabeth Haigh updated 05:36 EST 03 Mar 2023

 

Aides for Matt Hancock asked if they could 'lock up' former UKIP leader 'pub hooligan' in 2020 amid the pandemic, leaked WhatsApp messages show.

 

The former Health Secretary is said to have wanted to discuss possible quarantine breaches by the politician 'urgently', and asked his office to get in touch with the Home Office to investigate, the reports.

 

In June 2020 Mr Farage travelled to the USA to meet with then-President , tweeting photos of himself enjoying the trip while the vast majority of the UK was unable to leave the country.

On July 4 he tweeted a video of himself in his local pub in Downe Village, Kent, exactly two weeks after he had attended a Trump rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

 

The revelation comes after from his communications to the newspaper.

 

At the time of his visit, anyone who entered the UK from abroad was required to quarantine for 14 days, or face a hefty fine.

 

According to the leaked messages, Mr Hancock shared a link to a news report about the possible breach of quarantine regulations with members of his 'top team', writing: 'We need to discuss this urgently'.

 

Aide Jamie Njoku-Goodwin responded to the Health Secretary: 'Does he count as a pub hooligan? Can we lock him up?'

 

A civil servant is also said to have suggested referring the matter to Priti Patel, who was Home Secretary at the time.

 

Mr Hancock then asked his aide to ask the Home Office whether they were 'considering it', the paper reports.

 

Several minutes later Mr Njoku-Goodwin responded: 'Just spoken to HO spads [Home Office special advisors].

 

'Sounds like we need to get PHE [Public Health England' to do one of their "spot checks" and prove that he isn't at home.'

 

Mr Hancock then asked his team to ensure Mr Farage's case was dealt with 'like any other' by the Home Office.

 

Representatives for Matt Hancock have been contacted for comment.

 

At the time of his return from the US, Mr Farage maintained he had waited the full two weeks before going to the pub, and added he had received a negative Covid-19 test result.

 

But speaking to the today, he said: 'If I was being honest with you, after the first set of lockdowns I wasn't really prepared for some little pipsqueak like Matt Hancock to tell me how to live my life, quite frankly.'

 

He added: 'It was pretty nip and tuck… which means I probably was in breach. I'm probably a Covidiot.'

 

Mr Farage reportedly receivedthree visits from police officers during the pandemic.

 

Journalist Ms Oakeshott shared the huge trove of messages with the paper after Mr Hancock gave her unprecedented access to his communications in order to work on his pandemic memoir.

 

A source close to the former Health Secretary, who had to step down after having been found in breach of his own coronavirus restrictions, said Ms Oakeshott had broken a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) by sharing the messages.

 

She also accused Mr Hancock of sending her a 'threatening' text late on Tuesday night, following the first batch of bombshell revelations.

 

Mr Hancock denied doing so but described her actions as a 'massive betrayal and breach of trust'.

 

Quizzed about how she would describe her behaviour towards Mr Hancock on BBC Radio 4 today, Ms Oakeshott said: 'What I'm not going to do, because it wouldn't be pretty, is get involved in a slanging match with Matt Hancock.

 

'He can threaten me all he likes.

 

'There are plenty of things I can say about his behaviour, by the way, that I'm not going to do, at least not at this stage, because this is not about Matt Hancock, it is so much bigger than that.

 

'Trust me, there's plenty I can say.'

 

In a statement on Thursday night, Mr Hancock told MailOnline: 'I am hugely disappointed and sad at the massive betrayal and breach of trust by Isabel Oakshott.

 

'I am also sorry for the impact on the very many people – political colleagues, civil servants and friends - who worked hard with me to get through the pandemic and save lives.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11813841/Can-lock-Matt-Hancocks-team-considered-action-against-Nigel-Farage.html

Anonymous ID: 02a817 March 5, 2023, 6:27 a.m. No.18450245   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0573

Chinese spy cameras discovered at Sandringham estate and at least FIVE Government departments

By Abul Taher And Cameron Charters For The Mail On Sunday 18:53 EST 04 Mar 2023

Chinese surveillance cameras are being used at one of theKing's main residencesand at least five Government departments – months after Ministers ordered their removal from sensitive sites on national security grounds.

 

The Mail on Sunday has established that CCTVcameras made by Hikvision – a company controlled by the Chinese Communist Party– are being used at various locations on the vast Sandringham estate – Charles's country seat.

 

Our investigation also found the cameras, which come withfacial recognition technology, trained on the entrances of Whitehall ministries, including the Department of Health and Social Care, Department for Energy Security and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Hikvision cameras are also situated at the building of Investments – an arm of theTreasury– which manages state-backed companies such as NatWest, and HM Land Registry.

 

Last week, we revealed how: CCTV cameras by Hikvision – which in the past hasworked closely with China's People's Liberation Army– Hikvision denies handing any footage to the Chinese government and says it complies with UK legislation.

 

But the firm is subject to China's National Intelligence Law, which can order companies to hand over data to its intelligence service.

 

In November, Oliver Dowden, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, ordered all Ministries to remove Hikvision cameras as well as those from any other Chinese firm that could send data to Beijing.

 

Security experts say buildings in Whitehall are particularly sensitive, as Ministers often receive guests with whom they have conversations on security. In April last year, the then Health Secretary Sajid Javid banned the use of Hikvision cameras in the Ministry after one of themcaught his predecessor, Matt Hancock, kissing his girlfriend Gina Coladangelo there. Kek!

 

In June, the Department told Tory MP Iain Duncan Smith that it had removed all Hikvision cameras. Last night, an angry Mr Duncan Smithaccused the Health Ministry of lying to him.He said: 'I will be writing to the Secretary of State for Health [Steve Barclay] for an explanation on this.

 

'It's one thing not to tell anything, but it is another thing to lie about it and say you have removed the cameras.'

 

At Sandringham, our reporter found five Hikvision cameras. Three were by car parks, while two were on trees by a play area.

 

Palace officialsrefused to sayif Hikvision cameras were also installed in the restricted areas of Sandringham.

 

At the Whitehall departments, our reporters found Hikvision cameras with360-degree viewsin front of the main entrances.

 

Luke De Pulford, of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said: 'Turning a blind eye to the security risks posed by these cameras, after promising to remove them, is the height of negligence.'

 

Jake Hurfurt, from Big Brother Watch, said: 'Chinese state-owned CCTV has no place in the UK. These cameras should not be watching over any British streets, let along the heart of our Government.'

 

After we approached the departments involved for comment, a Cabinet Office source said the Government is complying with Mr Dowden's order and has started to remove Hikvision cameras from sensitive sites. He did not specify what those places were.

 

A spokesman said: 'We take the security of our personnel, systems and establishments very seriously.' A Buckingham Palace spokesman said last night: 'We do not comment on security.'

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11821505/Chinese-spy-cameras-discovered-Sandringham-estate-FIVE-Government-departments.html

Anonymous ID: 02a817 March 5, 2023, 6:33 a.m. No.18450269   🗄️.is 🔗kun

PN>>18449287

I truly hope all of them die an ugly death in a nursing home with the same drugs they gave to the elderly

Anonymous ID: 02a817 March 5, 2023, 6:44 a.m. No.18450316   🗄️.is 🔗kun

PN >>18449320

Note of advice to Matt Hancock, Health Minister and others in leadership. Don’t ditch or disappear on your girlfriend who is working on your biography with literally 100s of 1000s of crimes against humanity in your documents.

 

Arrogance is the downfall of tiny tyrants.It never ends well asshole, ie General Patreus

Anonymous ID: 02a817 March 5, 2023, 7:13 a.m. No.18450408   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0497 >>0573

==For anyone interested in Michael Gove the man conspiring with Hancock=

Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and Minister for Intergovernmental Relations

The Rt Hon Michael Gove MP

 

Biography

The Rt Hon Michael Gove was appointed Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and Minister for Intergovernmental Relations on 25 October 2022.

He was previously Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities between 15 September 2021 and 6 July 2022, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster from July 2019 to September 2021, and Minister for the Cabinet Office from February 2020 to September 2021. He was Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs from June 2017 to July 2019.

He was elected Conservative MP for Surrey Heath in 2005.

Education

Michael was educated at Robert Gordon’s College, Aberdeen and Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford University.

Political career

Michael was Shadow Minister for Housing from 2005 to 2007 and Shadow Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families from 2007 to 2010.

He served as Secretary of State for Education from May 2010 until July 2014. From July 2014 to May 2015, he served as Government Chief Whip and Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury. Michael also served as Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice from May 2015 until 14 July 2016.

__Career outside politics_

Michael became a journalist after leaving university, working as a reporter for The Press and Journal in Aberdeen, a researcher and reporter at Scottish Television and a reporter for BBC Television. He was later Assistant Editor of The Times.

Personal life

Michael has 2 children.

 

Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities

Strategic oversight of department’s business

Minister for inter-governmental relations

Cross-cutting responsibility for Levelling Up-Public Appointments

Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities

Minister for Intergovernmental Relations

Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities

Previous roles in government

Minister for Intergovernmental Relations

2021 to 2022

Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities

2021 to 2022

Secretary of State for Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government

2021 to 2021

Minister for the Cabinet Office

2020 to 2021

Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, and Secretary of State

2019 to 2021

Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

2017 to 2019

Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice

2015 to 2016

Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury (Chief Whip)

2014 to 2015

Secretary of State for Education

2010 to 2014

 

(Why was he involved in Covid messaging?)

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/people/michael-gove

Anonymous ID: 02a817 March 5, 2023, 7:49 a.m. No.18450497   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18450408 Hancock &Gove

We proved in the high court that Michael Gove broke the law. So what happens now?

Our legal victory, which proves there has beeninstitutionalised cronyism over Covid contracts, will have real-world effects

Jolyon Maugham QC is a barrister and director of Good Law Project

Thu 10 Jun 2021 11.55 EDT

 

Shut out the noise and the story is a simple one.

The pandemic was starting to hit. To manage public health, government needed to influence public behaviour. To influence public behaviour it needed to understand how different health messages would land. To understand how messages would land it needed feedback from focus groups.And getting focus groups meant getting external help.

But from whom?

Dominic Cummings, then Boris Johnson’s chief adviser, wantedPublic First. It was run by his friends– though Cummings claims this had no influence on his advice. He had worked with its key people for decades. He said it should be given the contract. Civil servants took that as an instruction. The Cabinet Office gave the contract to Public First.

This was first revealed by the Guardian and OpenDemocracy last July. Good Law Project, where I work, took Michael Gove, the minister in charge of the Cabinet Office, to courtto prove he had broken the law.

Before the high court our argument was that this looked like favouritism – the legal phrase is “apparent bias” – and it was unlawful.

The high court agreed. It rejected Gove’s arguments that no one else could do the job. The truth, it found, was thatno one had even considered giving the contract to anyone else.

It appeared to a reasonable observer – that being the legal test – as though Public First’s relationships with Cummings and Gove had won the contract for it. Gove had indeed broken the law.

So why does it matter?

The Cabinet Office says it doesn’t. It says the judgment “makes clear that there was no suggestion of actual bias and the decision to award the contract was not due to any personal or professional connections”. As it happens, that’s not true. There may very well have been actual bias – but the court didn’t decide because no one asked it to. It wasn’t the legal question.

The decision matters because it doesn’t just speak to how this contract was awarded. It alsospeaks to so much of government’s procurement spending.

We’ve seen the vast contracts – for hundreds of millions – won by those placed in the “VIP lane”.

We’ve seen how Matt Hancock’s social circle has cleaned up;how those with links to Tory prime ministers have delivered PPE contracts for associates; how Andrew Feldman used his temporary position in the Department of Health to lobby for a PPE contract for a client of his PR agency.

Good Law Project has characterised this conduct asinstitutionalised cronyism. I believe yesterday’s ruling illustrates our point.

When you spend public money you have a duty – owed to those whose money it is, to you and me – to spend it properly in service of the public interest. And to be ready to show the public that you have; to justify your decisions. That’s the deal. By showing apparent favouritism, theCabinet Office broke that deal– and it is very troubling for it to compound the illegality of its actions by pretending it’s not a problem.

So what happens now?

There will be real-world effects. Government lawyers and civil servants speak to me of a tug-of-war with ministers over spending.Civil servants want a proper decision-making process, and ministers want to bypass it.When ministers lose legal cases it strengthens the hands of civil servants. By highlighting the risks of poor decision making, it leads to better-quality decisions.

There should also be resignations.

Cummings worked for Boris Johnson. Gove was the defendant. Each is indirectly responsible for Cummings’ actions. What’s more,emails releasedduring the hearing show both Gove and No 10 wanted contracts to go to Public First, too. They also have a direct responsibility for what appears to be a misuse of public money.

We now know neither will resign. And the question of how to deliver accountability to ministers whose response to court rulings is indifference, even contempt, is one I had hoped never to need to answer. Clearly we need to build, and we will build, political pressure.So far we have fought two cases proving ministers broke the law, and we have won both. There are many more cases to come.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jun/10/high-court-michael-gove-law-cronyism-covid-contracts

There’s a lot more to this story and Cummings wrote multiple articles on substack about Hancock and Gove all in 2021

Lawyers Twitter that got Gove and his tweets:

 

https://twitter.com/JolyonMaugham/status/1402584737462505472?s=20