PN>>18456611 Are the Hancock Covid Files narrative control?
100% with this. Anon said this is so much worse. They are not telling about Boris’s agreement and plans with Hancock and what they did to the elderly in care homes. They killed them, 1000s of them (their death numbers are outrageous)!
And Boris even when Hancock apologized, and there was a outcry to resign, Boris wanted to keep him on. Why was Boris protecting him and otgers? In the Cummings substack articles he said Hancock & the PM he were a fucking nightmare and no one demanded him getting canned. PMs admitted to Cummings totally mis or mal-managed the epidemic and said I suspect we are killing the elderly. All of them knew, maybe not the entire plan, but all of them covered up for that guy and for England.
There’s a lot of horrid evil things the Telegraph will never release, just pin it on Hancock. He’s still an MP but independent (according to his resignation article), why wasn't he banished forever from a gov job? These MP’s knew they are just cowards and in on the depopulation plot.
Guaranteed anyone gung ho on green energy, knew the entire plan. Very few rebels against in Parliament and government that don’t the specious lie of Green Energy which requires depopulation.
The paper never talks about the damage to school children, how far behind they are now. Or hospitals and how the NHS was totally broken and still is in UK.
As interesting it is to have a scapegoat, he’s just a scapegoat for the elite. I wonder how much money the paper is getting to hold all the worst crimes back? And I think there are worse crimes, anons may not or don’t even know about irl!