>>18458909

You seem to post daily about the doomed nature of man. This is not new info to any anons.

What else are you willing to share that may not have been considered by most here?

What value are we, the anon collective, providing to ourselves and to the larger human collective, by continuing to vet real time goings on in OSINT global affairs, from your perspective? And if none, how better could this collective mindscape of volunteers be used?

>>18459120

paint the target, describe the enemy please.

Also, getting killed is a bit irrelevant when predestined to a mortal terminus anyway, no?

Anon trusts no one to watch out for and/or do for/with anon, but trusts that most will be deceptive, fear-driven addicts as evidence has and continues to illustrate.