Re-posting comment bc it was at end of pb.
I really do not know that this is an accurate assessment of the texts?
Maybe?
I've been re-reading them today and my initial instinct stands:
They're /ourguys/.
I'm open to being proven wrong, of course!
Just… Hmm. Anyone else notice some linguistic
nuances, or "timeline coincidences", or interesting conversations re: Andy?
Or anything else?
I mean, I know 500 pages is a lot of pages -
at the same time, it is a VERY INTERESTING 500 PAGES!