they spend too much time reading and listening to hacks like loftus and his ilk (Warning: the religious believers engaged in this whole shit show are just as bad as the atheists) http://www.debunking-christianity.com/
they spend too much time reading and listening to hacks like loftus and his ilk (Warning: the religious believers engaged in this whole shit show are just as bad as the atheists) http://www.debunking-christianity.com/
way to wear your Southern baptist roots on your fucking forehead.
does your bible come with scofield's notes as well?
am all for a bit religiousfagging on here and find it somewhat relevant, but the baptism discussion is a loser everytime. those protestants with a covenant theology hermenuetic tend toward infant/child baptism. it is seen as a replacement for the circumcision ritual (which the reformed do not engage in, at least outside of america) that abraham's folk follow.
the dispensationalists tend more toward adult baptism (not a perfect fit as there are some reformed baptists that combine strict calvinism with adult baptism.
if we're going to have the religious discussions on here let's keep it informed at the very least. and certainly no proselytizing for your preferred position (unless attacking scofield and his zionist sponsored notes)
recycled. we've been here before, though i do like to kick them around a bit. so hopefully they'll say something particularly stupid.
i'd like to say that i do this for the benefit of anons with less knowledge in this area. but its actually just cuz i like givin the shills a kickin now and again.
>BaptismShill slide is all, don't feed the troll. I fed it a little and am disappointed in myself.
if you attack the cabalistic roots of the religious slides they will stop responding.
scofield's notes + their roots in zionism is my current recipe. i can't get any of the fuckers to engage on that (maybe now they will….PLEASE????)