>>18465720 (pb)

Oh, brother

I hope y'all do a little more digging.

https://natural-fertility-info.com/does-stevia-cause-infertility.html

https://archive.ph/VT6yf

News flash, infertility is cause by the covid shots.

They have hired a team of people to try and sell the idea infertility is caused by all kinds of other silly things. This is because they know they are going to strung up by angry mobs.

It's from the poison clot shot, and it's huge and unstoppable at this point. If you gave your kids fauci's jiggle juice you won't have grand kids.

It's not because they drink a tiny bit of stevia in their tea. haha, gheesh.

The only thing notable about those stevia links is that this board is now running interference and shilling for big pharma.

The study cited is from 1968.

If stevia is such a great contraceptive how come big pharma hasn't extracted the ingredient to make a profit from it.

It's been around for decades. How are people still having kids?

But not until NOW, is it going to activate it's infertility magic?

Nonsense

>>18466030

Haha, from your own links:

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600158/

"The properties of Stevia have been studied for over 100 years. Both earlier and current studies not only confirm the safety of Stevia leaf preparations but also find more and more benefits of its consumption for human health."

• Antioxidant properties of S. rebaudiana

• Anti-cancer effects

• Anti-inflammatory and bactericidal action of Stevia. Anti-cariogenic properties

• Stevia in the Treatment of Diabetes

• Anti-hypertension effects of Stevia

• Stevia effects on obesity

• Renal function

The main evidence of Stevia safety is that for over 1500 years of continuous use by Paraguayans, there have been any reports of adverse effects. Additional confirmation of the safety of Stevia consumption is the absence of reports on side effects of any kind in Japanese populations where Stevia has been consumed in large quantities in recent years (Singh and Rao, 2005[100]). In addition, most of the studies that have investigated Stevia effects on the human body have showed no side effects (Roy et al., 2010[90]; Nikiforov et al., 2013[69]; Uçar et al., 2017[107]). However, it should be noted that not all of the Stevia products sold are of high quality. In particular, in the one experiment Raman spectra of six commercial products of Stevia were measured and it was found that three of the commercial Stevia products were counterfeit products. They also contained sodium cyclamate and small amounts of sodium saccharin (Jentzsch et al., 2016[44]).

Even from the Mellis study (from 1999) the one that is linked from the first study you link, it says this right in it:

>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378874199000811

Results: Hystological and morphometric analysis of testis, seminal vesicle, prostate and cauda epididymidis revealed no signs of impairment in Stevia-treated animals.

The Machado article requires purchase

Sorry, but as far as I'm concerned the "Stevia causes infertility" is an obvious low quality pfizer shill operation.

How can anyone not be suspicious of a brand new infertility revelation?

All we have seen from the shill news lately has been stories about how all kinds of ridiculous things NOW cause heart attacks. Like "Winter Vagina" haha, seriously, they said that. You don't think they are looking for other things to blame for the infertility their toxic clot shots caused?

Why don't they target aspartame? Something super poisonous. Rumsfeld that fucking turd.

I kinda wish he was still alive so he could be tried and then executed for the pain he cause this country.

>>18466414

>>18466425

I buy the organic leaf and put it in tea.

It's cheap and tasty and you just need a tiny bit.

https://www.starwest-botanicals.com/product/stevia-leaf-c-s-organic/

>>18466449

Yes, I have been hood winked by "big stevia"

The giant corporation that runs the world to secretly get people using their deadly infertility products

Mwah mwah mwah

when is that the last stevia ad you have seen?

>>18466464