>>18467935 (lb)
>>18467937 (lb)
It looks like Cumberbatch's Julian Assange after missing HRT for 4 months, yes.
>He also inherited a poorly handled pandemic response.
Well, that's a zinger, but to think otherwise would require you to be a conspiracy theorist thinking there was a plan in place.
If you're guessing, they're guessing, and that means…
So?
The dude's on TV 5 nights a week, and also with a daytime program. He's not a lumberjack or a block mason. His job is persuasive news entertainment. Appearances matter.
Tucker's already dove into that, along with Jesse and some others. They couldn't avoid it much longer, so they've done a lot of coverage on it. Did they cover it before midterms? No. Did they cover the fact that there was no coverage before midterms? YES. Why? Because it's a useful narrative.
They had it. Everyone that knew where to look had access to it. They didn't report on it, though. The game Fox plays is "push it out as long as possible to make it look like we did our due diligence, and then cry outrage because no one else dare give you the facts like we do".
It's an effective strategy, really.