for a saturday morning there is a very high concentration of shills here.
the breads are fast.
the shills are posting all their 'humor', which isn't funny but mostly just depravity pretending to be dark humor.
must have been something important that happened recently . . .
filter this jerk every time you see it.
I wasn't telling you to do anything.
I was telling myself.
and noting that the 'shill suck-face-saturday-shitposter' is FIRST TIME today.
catch phrase shill saturday anon, shut up!
are you going to do an audit of everyone and then access what is 'fair'?
so is 'level set' a code for 'we'll give you what you get and you won't be able to do anything about it?'
you do understand that Communism and Marxism are never about equality and fairness, that's just a story for the newbie rubes.
echos of the depraved
first day of the new shill effort to ruin saturdays with crap-posts
the problem is the 'catch-phrase creepos'
catch-phrsae creepos need to be outted as shills.
no cliques are needed.
I don't care if they post.
but if they post that, they get the back-atcha because it's obvious what they are doing.
I'm not asking to shut anyone off, but instead that if they spam a catchphrase and claim to be 'board-cuties' that people say 'oh, that is that group doing it again, please stop'
you know that they are shills because of the depravity and the insults.
there is nothing you need to join, just keep your posts respectful and don't buy into the depravity, which is always what the shills are selling.
TY for your reply
it's all slides anon.
sounds good isn't a reason to spam it.
they can do what they want but they should expect a blow-back when they spam it nonsensically like they are high and posting drunk.
the issue is the spamming of a catch phrase and starting the slide.
a catchphrase is OK.
but if you see it in every other post that means that a team is trying to make it into a trigger phrase to induce behavior.
it's the spamming and the attempt to make operational phrases that are used to control people that I object to.
the sauce is weak on this story.
but it's sure a fun little narrative.
you'd think if she had that much cash she'd have started her own bank . . .
probably there isn't anyone who knows all.
one conjetcure:
they took a person who had issues and groomed him for a role.
he was a dupe.
he snapped out of it when he realized what people were pushing him to do.
you know, to be fair to my point of view about the spamming of operational phraseing, it's fine to shitpost at times.
sometimes breads need to be filled.
when a news day is full of important events that need to be put out into the publics attention, shitposting is a distraction.
also if Q were posting.
but sometimes in a slow bread the baker says 'fill' and then a flood of posts happens, usually it would be a meme stream.
but since most memes now adays are over-produced and made by shills, a meme stream is often a depravity stream.
if people need to shitpost, then just do it.
you don't need to say a name for the time that you do it.
and there is not set time every week where it's OK.
it just matters what is operationally happening in the world. It matters what is going on in the news, if operators are in the field and expect a bread: that would be a time to NOT shitpost.
if Q posted back in the day suddenly the chatty meme makers who would post suddenly stopped during the phase when Q was active.
when did the father convert to Catholicism?
in the 1930s? or were his parents Catholic too?
was he one of the ones who the Marxists sent to infiltrate?
I thought the guy was Middle Eastern?
note that this one is spamming a face.
I was buying silver until I realized that the price was set by fraudsters.
and then I stopped.
do you know the story about the antique clock and who knocked it down on Jan 8 of this year in Brazillia. I heard it from a friend but I couldn't find sauce.
maybe if you have Brazilian connections you know the story?
cool. I need to pay my bills, anon.
if the price never moves it makes sense to say 'there is only so much I need to have for that possible worst-case scenario.
keeps spamming the face and repeating it self.
what have I done to you except defend myself from your false statements?
and then describing what you are doing.
you spammed an image repeatly, and that tells me all I need to know about you.
if you can't stand the commentary about your slanders, then don't slander anyone.
if you're following along: I gave a conjecture and that other one said I claimed insider knowledge.
It's within my right to defend myself.