>POL on patch
>Here comes the 💥BOOM❗️💥
>The likely banks to fail are thePDEO BANKS
Deplorable4trump2024
@PTRUMPFORTX2020
🚨 Silicon Valley Bank isone of the 10 banks who got Epstein related subpoenasfrom the AG in the US Virgin Islands who was trying to find his sources of money.
Image
Image
Image
Image
10:50 AM · Mar 12, 2023
·
164.8K
Views
https://twitter.com/PTRUMPFORTX2020/status/1634929873717428224
>🚨 Silicon Valley Bank isone of the 10 banks who got Epstein related subpoenas
>The likely banks to fail are thePDEO BANKS
A new MIT report on Jeffrey Epstein raises questions about how much to blame billionaires like Bill Gates
How complicit was Silicon Valley?
By Theodore Schleifer@teddyschleifer Jan 10, 2020, 8:40pm EST
For months, tech billionaires have been on the ropes over the ties they maintained with money manager Jeffrey Epstein well after he was indicted and registered as a sex offender in 2008. Many of those connectionscentered around MIT’s Media Lab,an institution popular in Silicon Valley and that had a concealed fundraising relationship with Epstein.
But many of those billionaires — from Bill Gates to Reid Hoffman — weren’t exactly revealing about their ties to Epstein when he was arrested this summer, or were at least quick to defend the Media Lab’s leadership over the Epstein situation.
Many hoped that a months-in-the-making external report from lawyers hired by MIT would finally put those questions to rest. But when the report was released Friday, investigators skirted direct answers and statements of fact, and ultimately failed to settle some of the basic questions about Silicon Valley’s responsibility for nurturing Epstein.
A Gates representative didn’t return a request for comment. A Hoffman representative referred to an apology Hoffman issued earlier this year about his interactions with Epstein.
Let’s start with Gates. The until-recently richest man in the world has consistently downplayed his ties to Epstein, telling one reporter, “I didn’t have any business relationship or friendship with him.” But Gates is among the tech billionaires with the most extensive disclosed ties to Epstein.
Whether Epstein and Gates did have a “business relationship” has been disputed. Gates did make a $2 million donation to the Media Lab in 2014. And Ronan Farrow reported in the New Yorker that Epstein was credited with securing the Gates money, with internal records saying that Epstein had “directed” the gift or that it was made at his instruction.
“Gates is making this gift at the recommendation of a friend of his who wishes to remain anonymous,” the record read.
Gates’s aides denied Epstein’s direction of the gift. But if he did, as Farrow reported he did, it raises the possibility that Gates was somehow complicit in the image rehabilitation of Epstein and part of an unseemly cover-up.
But MIT investigators did little to help establish truth and fiction in the situation.
“In 2014, Epstein claimed to have arranged for Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates to provide an anonymous $2 million donation to the Media Lab,” MIT’s lawyers wrote in the 63-page report. “Representatives of Bill Gates have told us that Gates flatly denies that Epstein had anything to do with Gates’s donation.”
This, suffice it to say, skirts the question of who is telling the truth — and effectively leaves it as an unresolved he said, she said.
When Recode asked the lawyers involved in the report if this sidestep was intentional, they would only say that “we didn’t see any evidence” that Gates or any Gates entity “were donating money from Mr. Epstein or that they were donating money at the behest of Mr. Epstein.” They used similar language — “there is no evidence” — to respond to the notion that Gates acted to “launder” Epstein’s money by donating money that didn’t belong to the Microsoft founder.
In the report, MIT’s investigators do not definitively say it did not happen — just that they didn’t see any evidence of it. And that statement would then have to be reconciled with MIT’s internal records, which offer at least some evidence to the contrary.
While there are many reasons to doubt the credibility of Epstein and of Joi Ito, the ousted head of the MIT Media Lab, there are also reasons why Gates and his denial should be scrutinized.
Despite Gates’s public comments minimizing his ties to Epstein, the New York Times uncovered numerous instances of the two meeting privately, to say nothing of Gates’s underlings. At one point, Gates told colleagues that the lifestyle of Epstein, who at that point was already a convicted sex offender, was “intriguing.” (A spokesperson told the Times the comment had nothing to do with Epstein’s lurid past.)
“Bill Gates regrets ever meeting with Epstein and recognizes it was an error in judgment to do so,” a Gates spokesperson told the paper this fall.
>A new MIT report on Jeffrey Epstein raises questions about how much to blame billionaires like Bill Gates
>How complicit wasSilicon Valley?
That brings us to another Silicon Valley luminary who has apologized over Epstein: Reid Hoffman.The LinkedIn founder and political powerbroker has his own ties to Epstein through the Media Labwhere he sits on the advisory board. Hoffman helped raise money for the Media Lab, which involved fundraising solicitation meetings with the sex offender.
“By agreeing to participate in any fundraising activity where Epstein was present, I helped to repair his reputation and perpetuate injustice.For this, I am deeply regretful,” Hoffman said.
Hoffman has said that he vouched for Epstein because Ito told him Epstein had cleared MIT’s vetting process.He even went so far as to bring Epstein out to Palo Alto in 2015 for a dinner with people like Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, and Peter Thiel.(Reminder: Epstein had been convicted on child prostitution charges for seven years by this point.)
That was the last time that Hoffman saw Epstein. But as recently as last August, Hoffman was standing up strongly for Ito and his handling of the Epstein situation. It took Hoffman until Farrow’s story in September to apologize.
And this new report from MIT makes clear that Hoffman and Epstein had other interactions over the years. In July 2013, Epstein visited the MIT campus to meet with Hoffman and others. And Hoffman continued to be consulted on Epstein matters.
“In July 2016, Ito sought advice from Reid Hoffman about whether to allow Epstein to attend a conference (perhaps the announcement of the Media Lab Directors’ Fellows) with “lots of people” who may “see him and maybe know he’s involved,” the authors write.
What they don’t write is what Hoffman actually advised Ito. That’s one of many things we still need to know to fully account for Silicon Valley’s complicity in the Epstein saga.
https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/1/10/21060678/jeffrey-epstein-bill-gates-reid-hoffman-silicon-valley
>A new MIT report on Jeffrey Epstein raises questions about how much to blame billionaires like Bill Gates
>How complicit was Silicon Valley?
REPORT CONCERNING JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S INTERACTIONS WITH THEMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYJanuary 10, 2020
> http://factfindingjan2020.mit.edu/files/MIT-report.pdf
>bet Sun Trust Bank is the 10th
thats a good guess
Panel 1 - Trends in Chinese High Tech Investment
by
USC U.S.-China Institute
Publication date
2014-04-03
In April 2014, Asia Society and the Rhodium Group launched a report on Chinese high technology investment in the United States. The study surveys the state of play and is intended to provide common ground for the ongoing debate, often ideological and acrimonious, over U.S-China high tech trade and investment in sectors such as information technology, life sciences, and clean technology.
Key topics include drivers of Chinese high-tech investment, current trends, and risks and opportunities for the U.S. posed by the investment boom. The report also offers a series of recommendations to policymakers and business leaders in both the U.S. and China.
Drawing from the Rhodium Group's proprietary database of Chinese investment in the U.S., the report's scope is national, but given the industry's distribution, it is the most relevant to audiences in California, New York, and other high-tech clusters in the U.S. The report is co-authored by Daniel H. Rosen and Thilo Hanemann of the Rhodium Group.
As Chinese outbound investment shifts from natural resources into more advanced, innovation-intensive industries, a rapidly increasing share is going into U.S. IT, cleantech, biotech, advanced transportation, and more. What are the hottest sectors drawing the most Chinese investment? Which Chinese firms are leading the surge and what is driving them? What are the economic and political factors behind these investments, and what are the most serious challenges they face? What is the impact on U.S. jobs, the tax base, and national security?
Speakers:
Lixin Cheng, Chairman and CEO of ZTE (USA) and President of North American Region
Mark S. Greenfield, Partner, Blank Rome LLP
Mark Horn, Senior Managing Director, Technology Banking, East West Bank
Kenneth Petrilla, Executive Vice President, Head of China Desk, Wells Fargo International Group
Ken Wilcox, Chairman, Silicon Valley Bank
Moderator:
Clayton Dube,Executive Director, USC US-China Institute
Notes
This material may be protected by copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code).
Addeddate
2020-02-02 18:14:31
Artist
USC U.S.-China Institute
https://archive.org/details/podcast_chinas-high-tech-surge-inve_panel-1-trends-chinese-hi_1000313224655
>dis what ECW tellin us last night
>Panel 1 - Trends in Chinese High Tech Investment
>by
> USC U.S.-China Institute
"Preparing Asians and Americans for a Shared Future"
Chinese Direct Investment in California
by
http://rhgroup.net/reports/chinese-direct-investment-in-california
Publication date
2012-10-12
Topics
documentcloud, chinafile, 2023-david-barreda
Collection
documentcloud; additional_collections
Contributor
David Barreda (ChinaFile)
To build the case for a robust response to these opportunities and looming risks, this report analyzes Chinese investment in California in depth, mining a unique database for insights about California’s comparative advantages, the Chinese firms most suited to its economy, and the forces motivating this inflection in cross-border investment patterns. The report explains where China is as an outbound investor relative to its past, its future, and other countries and assess California’s position as a destination for Chinese OFDI flows compared to its sister states.
(Unofficial mirror of http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/463182-chinese-direct-investment-in-california.html)