>hitler started by being anti-tranny
she's actually sorta right about this.
so was hitler.
>Hitler was the good guy.
>wrong
NO ONE is all good or all evil, right about everything or wrong about everything.
on trannies and sexual depravity, hitler was right and cyndi lauper is wrong.
>nonsense and revisionism.
this is (((YOUR))) idea of nonsense and revisionism???
NO ONE is all good or all evil, right about everything or wrong about everything.
>Hitler considered himself a leftie, you dumb ass
>Goebbels said so as well.
>You are a misinformed useful idiot.
>Tell me, were they SOCIALISTS, or not?
>Socialists are lefties.
>Big government, or not?
>Big government that controls everyone and everything is leftie.
STFU, jackoff. (((YOU))) are the one blinded by labels.
ACTIONS speak louder than words. socialism means no private property and the gov't gives everyone a free lunch.
hitler and nazi germany did NEITHER of those things, ergo, they were NOT socialists.
QED.
now find something else to create a new slide.
or KYS.
either works for me.
>with more opportunities than ever, why are teen girls so depressed?
choices are scary.
they come with responsibility for the consequences.
life is simpler when you're told what to do.
life is better when you live in harmony with biological reality (motherhood/parenting).
by every metric available, the happiest people on the planet live way below the poverty level, have large families, and do hard work all their lives.
>but he was evil and caused mass death and destruction.
shallow thinking.
hitler was a helpless puppet set up as the patsy to take the blame for the mass death and destruction cause by others.
"others" who believe they are God's chosen people, and who wish to exterminate both Christians and the white race.
"others" who were the ones who achieved massive financial and political gains as a result.
sound like anyone you know?
> trying to fix Germany and succeed from the NWO
trying to say, "fix germany and SECEDE from the NWO"
pls try to remember that no one pays attention to fuckwits who don't know the difference.
i'm in your corner, dumbass, and i want your arguments to SUCCEED. so suck it up.
>Why would anyone do that, if they "were the enemies"? It makes zero sense.
MOAR shallow thinking.
another perfectly SENSIBLE reason is that the US knew that the USSR would be an enemy as soon as the nazis were defeated. we took them to prevent the soviets from getting them. the nazis had shitloads of intel on BOTH the US and USSR, and their scientists and engineers were DECADES ahead of any other scientists and engineers in the world.
you are clearly a no-child-left-behind (translation: make everyone as stupid as the dumbest dumbfuck in the room).
>I was here when Q posted the Hitler stuff.
oh wow. then you must be the greatest authority on earth.
ICYMI, people were digging on this shit before WWII even started. get over yourself and your half-assed opinions.
>Actually Soviets got some as well, so you make no sense
i never said they didn't. lame-ass attempt at a strawman argument. and it only proves how much sense it DID make.
>On top of that: How about KILLING them instead?
great idea, just trash an irreplaceable resource without even finding out what you're destroying.
GREAT FUCKING PLAN, FUCKTARD.
>And Hirohito? He a good guy too?
well he's not the bad guy.
the US deliberately and knowingly bent over backwards to provoke japan into attacking pearl harbor, bcs japan had signed a treaty with germany, and that was the "sky event" FDR needed to get the american public to support US entry into the war. on 12/6/41 the public was 90% AGAINST going to war with germany.
>It only works out when it's rich vs. everyone else and you are the useful idiot defending the rich, believing that there is a side that cares about you and loves you, but in reality would have sent you to your death.
STOP PUTTING YOUR WORDS INTO MY MOUTH. I NEVER SAID ANY OF THAT.
of course it's always been the filthy rich against everyone else. that does NOT mean that all the puppets are PART of the cabal, which is what YOU are trying to imply. most are useful idiots, totally unaware they are being played like a $2 fiddle.
furthermore, your arguments are self-contradictory and self-inconsistent. puppets only function when they don't realize they're puppets, so it's necessary to maintain the illusion, ESPECIALLY for the puppets.
i am NOT defending the rich, you pompous bloviating ASSHAT. i agree with you, but you're too pigheaded to listen or hear what anyone else is saying, as if you and only you know everything there is to know, and everyone else is a shill.
now SETTLE YOUR ASS DOWN, KAREN.
>you're views of human nature are laughable.
your monolithic everything is black or white views of human nature are terrifying.
>They can be aware and willfully playing their part.
if that's true, there must be something in it for them. a payoff. and if they're told to play the part of the loser, they would need to be promised a way out and a new identity. so it becomes necessary for the cabal to keep their promises, otherwise they no one would be willing to be their puppet in the future. it's like saying, "why don't bookies refuse to pay winners, they could make more money if they ripped everyone off." maybe true in the short term, but they're playing the long game, and the most important thing is to keep the game going. so they pay the winners, knowing there will always be more losers than winners.
this slide is nothing more than an exercise in semantics, because we basically agree. you just chose different labels, and you seem to be obsessed with your labels to the point that they've become more important than what they represent.
>Better today?
yes. thx.
>I'm being so good.
better is not necessarily good.
could still do without the anime.
if you know it's offensive to so many anons, why would you want to continue to provoke dissent? is it THAT important? or just childish stubbornness?
it's NOT your job to assess the mental health of anons. nor is it your job to tell them what they SHOULD or should NOT see.
what they see and how they react is JUST as valid as what you see and how you react. NEITHER side is right or wrong.
but since sides obviously DO exist, WHY would anyone want to cause friction? why do YOU insist on causing friction?
>Hitler didn't die '45.
no shit, sherlock. show me where i said he did.
you act like you're the only one that knows it. you're being an arrogant condescending ASS.
get off your high horse, and stop berating others for saying basically the same thing only using different words.
>You do not have a right not to be offended. You do not have a right to be 'comfortable
never said i did, ASSFUCK.
what i ASKED is what is there to be gained by being deliberately provocative for no apparent valid reason.
so take your pompous bloviating divisionfagging and shove it up your ass sideways, then set it on fire.