>What's wrong with the article?
what's correct and notable about it?
>So it is one theory of who his handlers may have been.
humansbefree.com from 2011 huh
so RRN is back on the notables menu since sauce matters not in loli land
good to know
simply asking why it was notabled
no anons labelled it as such, and you included it 2 minutes and 7 posts after it was OP'd without even giving it a chance to be an organic notable
what is notable about it? "Q said Hitler was a puppet" therefore it's a good source? Q said a bunch of shit that when applying the same logic would put RRN as fact
or do you disagree with that
who owns the site that you included and then removed? can you confirm it's less lefty & faggy than RRN? or is was that a little bit of conjecture
RRN has a disclaimer that some of the information is fiction, does that mean everything posted is fiction?
This isn't about RRN or that other site, just an anon asking why some bullshit was notabled, carry on with whatever you're doing