>>18510190

I copied this from somewhere - didn't mark the source.

This looks odd. Because all the plants mercury and venus are clear circles in the images.

Might try to resource this again.

>>18510277

You know this is not video from SOHO, right?

They are still frames and then compiled into movie maker.

So anything that appears in a single image and then is not there was likely airbrushed out.

>>18510297

"You are watching a movie" comes to mind.

>>18510315

> where the image came from

I have been in various FITs archives.

I was trying to get back there to see if that's where I sourced it from. Looks like I had it on my local computer at one point so it wasn't a copy from someone else. Wish I had kept the path to it. I'll find it again.

>>18510315

Somewhere here is where I was able to find this.

https://ssa.esac.esa.int/ssa/#/pages/search

>>18510315

I found it on the helioviewer again.

https://www.helioviewer.org/

Same time stamp - this is browser based so you don't have to install any software.

Same weird thing. Its there and then gone?

Are they airbrushing this stuff and miss a frame on purpose?

>>18510508

From the browser helioviewer - top right there is a button to dowload the image.

The image I downloaded looks like this for file format

And the image.

So that image is legit. wonder if anyone on any of the jpl/nasa boards has an explanation for this one image being out of place?

>>18510576

Mercury wasn't there in the 2 minutes prior.

So -

And get this - the image from SOHO seem to be in about a 12 min capture time span.

So

13:47 nothing

13:49 this image

14:02 image gone