While reviewing posts I saw one that seemed to be 'speaking for the board' and I flamed it with a review that was off base.
as it turned out it was the BO.
and I want say that if anyone does speak for the board, of course, it is the BO.
so I want to apologize again to the BO.
I feel like that guy who called Q a Fa g g o t!
Wellesley College has voted to descriminate against men who aren't Trans, and will let men enroll in their indoctrination programs, but only if they are Trans.
hopefully lawsuits will quickly follow.
https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2023/03/15/womens-college-no-more-wellesley-students-vote-to-admit-trans-men-n716483
Probably the guy who called Q a newfag and the others who called him a fa g g ot
felt worse than I do.
I like BO and I know he does speak for the board so . . . I made a mistake and now I have to be more careful before I start in with a morning review of the board.
he speaks for the board in the sense of he's always here and runs the place.
that's how I mean it.
he doesn't speak for the anons who lurk here, they speak for themselves. this is exactly the thing that I didn't realize when I flamed a post last bread where someone was making statements about the tolerance of the board. I didn't know it was BO!
the board has no consensus, that is impossible.
so if you mean 'the board' as 'all the anon', then you are correct. But I was saying it in the sense of he's the one who works the board, fixes and upgrades, and tells us about maintenance, ETC ETC.
in that sense he does speak for the board.
get it?
I'm not trying to install anyone.
this place wouldn't be here if he weren't working it.
show screen caps of them being used before.
you just start using names, and if you get away with it , you'll keep it up to craft a new persona: that is what it seems to be, but of course I could be wrong.
and you can shut me up by showing screen caps of when they were every used before.
kay?
I see no caps so I'm going to say stop the slide.