https://mobile.twitter.com/profnfenton/status/1635714219248058384

Prof Norman Fenton

@profnfenton

1. The response to my subject access information request for

@TheLancet

internal correspondence discussing our letter re flawed Pfizer study was heavily redacted. But this thread will show that even unredacted bits reveal their unprofessional behaviour https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-lancet-heavily-redact-their-response

Prof Norman Fenton

@profnfenton

·

20h

Replying to

@profnfenton

1. It's clear I was being discussed in a negative light as they were referring to me as 'an ongoing issue'. Also clear they only reached out after I publicised their initial delayed rejection letter on twitter (they were getting a lot of heat as a result of that).

Prof Norman Fenton

@profnfenton

1. Note that after much discussion they seem to reluctantly concede that I have a legitimate academic appointment

Prof Norman Fenton

@profnfenton

·

20h

Replying to

@profnfenton

1. Not sure if it's me or one of my colleagues who they refer to as ‘a source of vaccine misinformation’:

Prof Norman Fenton

@profnfenton

·

20h

1. In the following they mention ‘helpful background on Fenton’. Did they try to dig up dirt on me on their own or did the 77th brigade furnish them with my dossier?

Prof Norman Fenton

@profnfenton

·

20h

1. Next, they accuse me and (most likely)

@MartinNeil9

of retweeting ‘anti-vaxx posts on Twitter’. I’d be interested to know precisely who they are referring to and what posts:

Prof Norman Fenton

@profnfenton

·

20h

1. They also refer to ‘holding off further email’ suggesting their offer to consider the letter was not genuine:

Prof Norman Fenton

@profnfenton

·

20h

1. This was the stuff they were prepared to reveal. 90% was redacted so imagine what that must have been like.

Prof Norman Fenton

@profnfenton

·

20h

1. Fortunately, we know

@TheLancet

editors responsible for this fiasco will read these tweets. Their reputation was damaged badly by previous scandals as well as this case. They're even more exposed now. Here's a reminder of what this https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-lancet-has-become-a-laughing

>>18511967

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1635714219248058384.html

https://dailycaller.com/2023/03/14/university-of-north-carolina-ralph-baric-us-right-to-know/

University Asks Judge To Block Release Of Documents Related To Dangerous Coronavirus Research

The University of North Carolina is asking a judge to block the release of documents related to the research of Dr. Ralph Baric, a pioneer in the world of dangerous gain-of-function virus research.

UNC is being sued by U.S. Right To Know, a nonprofit watchdog that works to expose wrongdoing by corporations and governments in the healthcare space, for documents related to Baric’s research while working at the university. While some documents have been turned over during the course of the coronavirus pandemic, UNC filed a motion to dismiss late last week seeking to prevent the release of some documents being sought by USRTK.

We are suing to compel the University of North Carolina to hand over Ralph Baric documents possibly related to the origins of Covid-19: https://t.co/H4BtZMiJto

Here is @UNC‘s reply brief to try to block further release of documents: https://t.co/4vkYIlT5ni pic.twitter.com/IkUozqluD7

— Gary Ruskin (@garyruskin) March 13, 2023

USRTK opted to sue after UNC refused to turn over certain documents sought via public records requests, citing a research exception under the Public Records Act. The organization has filed 13 public records requests on the work done by Ralph Baric, Toni Baric and Lishan Su. The university failed to turn over any documents after a February mediation session.

“The University of North Carolina, as an institution of higher learning, should help the public to learn everything that can be learned about the pandemic and its origins, and not try to obscure or bury such lessons,” Gary Ruskin, executive director of USRTK, told the Daily Caller. “We don’t really know why UNC is trying to keep these Baric documents secret, even though there is worldwide interest in them. We do know that Ralph Baric was a close collaborator with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. We also know that Baric was on the DARPA DEFUSE proposal, which in retrospect reads something like a how-to guide for creating SARS-CoV-2.”

Baric is a notable figure in the world of microbiology for developing a groundbreaking method of inserting new genetic code into pathogens without leaving any evidence, and using it to make coronaviruses more dangerous as part of research projects.

He’s collaborated throughout his career with Peter Daszak and Dr. Shi Zhengli, China’s infamous “bat woman” researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Daszak is the head of EcoHealth Alliance, the nonprofit that funneled taxpayer money from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to the WIV for gain-of-function research.

Proponents of the lab leak theory of COVID-19 origin believe that gain-of-function research at the WIV, the type of work Baric engages in, led to the release of the virus from the Wuhan lab and kickstarted the pandemic. (RELATED: Not Just China: The US Government, Universities Are Hiding Evidence On The Origin Of COVID-19, Experts Allege)

Emails unearthed previously by USRTK from Dr. Anthony Fauci reveal that Fauci had scheduled a meeting with Baric in the early weeks of the pandemic, during which they apparently discussed pandemic outbreaks and genetically modified viruses.

https://mobile.twitter.com/drcole12/status/1635764636342685696

ryancolemd

@drcole12

ABSOLUTE NONSENSE! They do not contain graphene oxide. Pablo Campras in Spain, fried the sucrose in the vials for 90 seconds using his laser doing Raman Spectroscopy, creating charcoal byproducts. He F-ing burnt the toast! One is supposed to laser for milliseconds. The world has been fooled by this horrible pseudoscience. This is cultish group think. Focus on the fact that the vials contain toxic lipid nano particles and gene sequences for a toxic protein.

Quote Tweet

Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌

@unhealthytruth

·

Mar 13

BREAKING NEWS: Pfizer Covid Vaccine vial contents exposed by WHO whistleblower. It contains graphene oxide, parasites, RFID, metals and nano circuitry. DARPA and Bill Gates developed these non biological synthetic injections to control the minds and … Show more

Show this thread

https://mobile.twitter.com/drcole12/status/1635764636342685696

https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1635850008141414400

>>18512003

https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk

>>18511991

they ALL do fren.

Sisters, daughters, mothers, wives, oh my!

>>18511913

Curevac, tesla's mrna printing company.

>>18511913

>>18512019

find one who tried and didn't like. :)

jus sayin'. not all anons are white.

knowing from experience is not the same as wondering, guessing, and hoping…

kanekoa.substack.com

@KanekoaTheGreat

.

@RobertKennedyJr

tells

@jimmy_dore

that Dr. Anthony Fauci has been in charge of developing bioweapons for the Pentagon since 2002, and in 2014, three viruses escaped from US labs, so he moved his bioweapons research to the Wuhan lab:

"They took the money that Cheney gave them [from the Patriot Act], $2.2 billion, and they funneled it through NIH, and it all went through Anthony Fauci. So beginning in 2002, Anthony Fauci got a 68% raise from the Pentagon for doing bioweapons development, and he got a raise of billions of dollars a year, and then he started doing all of this gain-of-function.

In 2014, three of those bugs escaped in high-profile escapes from different labs in the US. Congress held hearings on it. Everybody was angry, and 300 top scientists sent letters to Obama saying you got to shut down Fauci because he is going to create a pandemic.

So, Obama ordered a moratorium, and at that time, Fauci had eighteen different gain-of-function experiments he was doing around the US. He instead moved his stuff offshore to Wuhan, where he could do it out of sight of these 300 scientists and nosy White House officials who were trying to shut him down.

And he continued to do it with the same people he was funding here, Ralph Baric and Peter Dazak, and they moved their operation to the Wuhan lab."

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

·

Mar 13

Replying to

@KanekoaTheGreat

@RobertKennedyJr

and

@jimmy_dore

Accurate

@CommunityNotes

?

Emerald Robinson ✝️

@EmeraldRobinson

·

Mar 14

Replying to

@elonmusk

@KanekoaTheGreat

and 3 others

The relevant expert to ask would be

@AGHuff

TexasLindsay™

@TexasLindsay_

Replying to

@EmeraldRobinson

@elonmusk

and 5 others

Agree. Between

@AGHuff

,

@CharlesRixey

and

@Jikkyleaks

this “mystery” would have been solved a long time ago.

anons know

https://anandamide.substack.com/p/failure-of-the-linearization-reaction

Failure of the linearization reaction in the Pfizer bivalent vaccine manufacturing process

>>18512081

>Failure of the linearization reaction in the Pfizer bivalent vaccine manufacturing process

The EMA documentation from

discloses Pfizers linearization strategy which utilizes a TypeIIs restriction enzyme known as Eam1104i. Restriction enzymes cut DNA based on a specific sequence pattern. Eam1104i cuts at 5’ CTCTTCN^NNN 3’ on the top strand and 3’ GAGAAGNNNN^N 5’ on the bottom strand. This can be seen in the Pfizer provided vector map at base 4,280 or ~6:00 above.

Figure 1. Eam1104i recognition sequence

Lets looks through the Deep Sequencing in IGV and see if we can find intact molecules. Upper left is an obvious place where the enzyme Eam1104i is cutting as you can see the consistent end points in the molecules we sequence. Upper right is another group of reads where the cut sites are intact (grey = sequence that matches reference).

Image

Figure 2. IGV view of the reads at the near the cut sites. Green reads are paired that diverge from the average insert size (105bp) reads. Grey reads reads are reads that map with the expected insert size.

Let’s zoom in on that so you can see the details. Sequencing OGs will notice there is more sequencing error near these sites as we near the poly As and some sequencing adaptors (dim ATCGs in the grey reads). What does that mean?

Image

Figure 3. IGV view of just the properly paired reads

Polymerase slippage is something that occurs with many polymerases (strand displacement polymerases exhibit less of this artifact) that stutter in long stretches of the same nucleotide like Poly As and Poly Ts. They ‘slip’ out of frame during amplification and you get an echo effect in the sequence data. PCR exacerbates the problem. Sanger sequencing of slippage is seen in figure

Image

Figure 4. taken from Nucleics website depicting polymerase slippage in Sanger sequencing reads. Recall Sanger sequencing is not a single molecule method. It’s an ensemble sequencing method were each peak represents millions of copies of a template and once they start to disagree or stutter you see peak on top of peaks like the G base at 170bp.

There are 2 PCR steps in the sequencing methods.

1)To amplify the Library after Illumina Adaptors are ligated on

2)During Bridge PCR on the Illumina array.

1- creates inter read disagreements

2- creates intra read disagreements

Image

Figure 5. Bridge PCR on the Illumina arrays creates clusters of 1000 molecules which should be clonaly identical… Unless there is PCR slippage during bridge PCR.

1- Can create high quality reads which disagree with each other on the length of the poly A and the neighboring sequence

2- Creates sequencing clusters that have discordant DNA and not fluorescently pure. This is spectral noise on the cluster being sequenced as all molecule in the cluster dont agree.. Low quality read locations.

Image

Figure 6. Paired reads which are orientated across the ends of the reference. These are known as Outtie reads as the green reads point outward from the reference sequence. The reads on the Left are pointing 5’→3’ to the Left. The reads on the right are pointing 5’→3’ to the right. They are joined by a thin green line which proves they came from the same spot on the cluster array. The same Bridge PCR molecule has reads that point away from each other. That only happens when the reference is a circle and they are actually pointing at each other. Your reference genome is creating an illusion of mis-orientate paired reads.

Since a sequence of 110As is like a jigsaw puzzle thats all one color, you want some edges to these sequences that help to define it as an edge piece or a provide some signature.

You want reads that anchor outside of the poly A on both sides of the 110bp poly A region. So you have some signature to map reads. Since we have a very short library (250bp) we can’t expect many reads to bridge 100bp poly A because ~150bp of the 250bp is Illumina adaptors.

p1

>>18512081

>>18512087

Image

Figure 7. Depiction of Illumina libraries. Indexes are DNA barcodes used to multiplex different libraries on the same sequencing run.

This is why we are being very cautious on calculating the % circular DNA. If you have very short insert libraries, you won’t sample many reads that span a 110bp un-mappable polyA region. You need 100bp+110bp+100bp so you have unique 100mers on each side of the polyA. 460bp library would be preferred but we might be able to live with 360bp (50bp anchor +110bp polyA +50bp anchor+ 150bp Illumina adaptors).

Image

Figure 8. Reference for the length of the Illumina adaptors

We got very lucky we captured any junctions at all and for that reason any estimation of circularity will be an underestimate. You'll notice out average insert size was 105bp.

Image

Figure 9. Samtools stats of the library insert size calculated from mapping the reads to the reference.

250bp library - 150bp adaptors = 100bp inserts.

Image

Figure 10. Agilent Tape Station 4200 electrophoresis of the fragment libraries generated from the vaccine DNA. Next attempt at this will use larger insert sizes and fragment the DNA less aggressively.

As you can see, while we learned a lot from these RNase A libraries, we now know there is a long Poly A in the vector and to properly span it we need larger insert libraries. This is as easy as making the 3minute fragmentation step down to 1minute and we should get larger inserts for our next Illumina run. This should provide a less biased assessment of the circle vs linear assessment.

Since the linearization step uses a single cut site, they could very easily quantitate the efficiency of this step with a qPCR assay that spans the cut site. The cut site is very close to the poly A tract which might make this a bit tricky to design.

They should also better disclose what assay they are using to detect residual DNA from the DNase I step. The next post will touch on this step of the process and what we can learn by using DNases and RNases in qPCR.

2 of 2

"Been in Government Lobbying for Three Decades. Retiring. Let me tell you a SECRET.

As a "soon to be" former government lobbyist, I have seen the truth about the corruption in the world's government. The politicians you see on TV (Trump, Biden, Bush, Obama, DeSantis, all of them) are not chosen by you, the voters. They are handpicked by powerful people and special interest groups who have their own agendas. This occurs mainly with money, and controlled media. The truth is that there are no heroes in this system. The politicians who rise to power are the ones who play along with the system, not those who stand up for the people. I am not saying the vote is not often legitimate, rather I am saying people are easily manipulated, and marketed to. The powers that be know how to get you to vote how they wish. You have seen it in fashion, branding… it's no different in politics. It is a carefully crafted narrative meant to give you an illusion of choice.

Both sides of the political spectrum in our world work hand in hand. They may appear to have different views, but they are ultimately controlled by the same interests. The illusion of choice is what keeps you believing in this system, but the truth is that the parties themselves are structured to ensure only those who play along get promoted. Every now and then, a wildcard is allowed, but even then, that is part of the well orchestrated plan. Good narratives need "surprises" right?

The system is rigged, and you are all playing your part in it. If you want to change the structure of your government, you have to stop falling for it all. You have to stop voting for the same old parties and the same old politicians who are just puppets on a string.

The truth is the person you like most in politics, or someone you felt great about voting for, or someone you think is "fighting the system", is not "the good guy". From your most conservative governors to your most liberal mayors of major cities.. they are one in the same.

I know this is hard to accept. I have seen the most evangelical of southern Governors screw over their base more times than not for corporate interests. Likewise, I have seen the most liberal of Democrats shirk promises of "criminal justice reform" and "equity" over a couple of commas in a check.

When it comes time for elections, they need lots of money… they need lots of PR… they need the massive donor mechanisms… the war dialing… they need the constructive complex narrative of opposition… and ALL of it is controlled by just a handful of companies.

The game is rigged and no matter how smart or right you think you are… you are almost always deceived. There may be 5% of the electorate that actually sees it. Chances are, if you typically vote for one of the major party candidates at any significant level, you are not one of those 5%.

If you want to actually affect change, you have to vote for the little guys, the independents, the third-party candidates who have a real chance to make a difference… truth is though this will probably never happen. You all are at a broken red light and fail to move until you see someone else go… problem is… no one goes.

You don't have a country, you have a corporation. You are not citizens, you are a product.

Sincerely,

A "Soon to Be" Former Government Lobbyist."

https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message5384336/pg1

"Avian Flu Is Already Devastating Bird Populations. Humans May Be Next."

https://www.thedailybeast.com/highly-pathogenic-avian-influenza-is-devastating-birds-and-humans-may-be-next

Still suffering from pandemic fatigue? Then you might not yet know about a virus that’s been sweeping the nation. It led to over 50 million deaths in 2022 alone, but don’t panic just yet. These deaths have only affected birds in the U.S. so far. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A (HPAI), a particularly gnarly form of H5N1 influenza, is highly contagious among birds and can have a nearly 100 percent death rate for the winged animals, according to the National Emerging Special Pathogens Training and Education Center.

Avian flu doesn’t jump over to humans very often. The U.S. reported its first human case of HPAI last April, in a person who was involved in culling birds at a farm where H5N1 had been confirmed to infect the poultry. The patient was isolated and recovered after treatment with antivirals, according to the World Health Organization.

But given the right conditions, a few spillover cases can quickly turn into a public health problem of epidemic proportions. Ebola is one example: Since its first description in 1976, the virus has spilled over intermittently to humans in regions where it is endemic. But the worst outbreak of the virus occurred in 2014, where it spread to more than 28,000 people in West Africa, killing more than 11,000.

Recent reports that HPAI has infected and killed off thousands of sea lions in South America have concerned researchers that the virus may someday be able to spread between humans or take part in a dangerous melting pot inside a mammalian host.

“We've been thinking a lot lately about this strain because of its potential to be a zoonotic disease” spread from animals to people, Adel Talaat, a microbiology researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, told The Daily Beast. Talaat has been working on vaccine development for avian influenza that one day could be given to poultry.

Wait, we’re vaccinating birds now??

The U.S. has not vaccinated poultry for avian influenza, but researchers including Talaat believe that we should start. He and his team are working on nanovaccines—shots in which active components are very small in size to better induce an immune response. His vaccine will be administered via a spray rather than injection, to more quickly vaccinate large numbers of birds.

It’s important to note that the goal with avian vaccination isn’t the same as if it were humans. The birds living on farms that would be vaccinated are just one sliver of the worldwide avian population, so rather than achieve any meaningful form of herd immunity, the goal in vaccinating them would be to minimize economic costs associated with HPAI and bird culling. Methods to vaccinate wild bird populations aren’t practical at this point, Talaat said, leading researchers to focus efforts on what they can feasibly control.

Sea lion cases could be a sign of things to come

Recent reports of sea lions spreading HPAI to one another and dying from the disease are more alarming for humans than they may sound. Researchers typically think about zoonotic diseases in multiple stages, and a series of mutations in the influenza virus are necessary for the pathogen to spread between humans, not just occasionally spill over from birds. That the virus is infecting a species of marine mammal without a hitch means it’s not as far from spreading between humans as we’d like to think.

p1

>>18512143

A second concern surrounding the infection of non-avian animals with HPAI is the threat of antigenic shift. The surface proteins of influenza viruses are what our immune systems recognize and use to produce neutralizing antibodies to match. But over time, these proteins change enough to be rendered unrecognizable. This process can also happen abruptly, when two subtypes of the influenza virus meet in a single host. Antigenic shift notably occurred to produce “swine flu” in 2009. “When shift happens, most people have little or no immunity against the new virus,” according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Antigenic shift is a real threat made more likely as the virus continues to infect sea lions, Talaat said. Surveillance is all researchers can do at the moment: “We have to be on the lookout for that—this is the best we can do at this point,” he said.

What happens if the virus jumps over? Am I at risk?

“We have to be ready, and what I mean by that is we have to be ready with a new vaccine,” Talaat said. “These events happen because of the continuous evolution of the virus, and we have no control over it. We don't have fences that prevent us from coming into contact with wild birds.”

The CDC has produced a candidate vaccine virus that, if needed, could be used to make a vaccine for humans. Countries would also have to be ready with a surplus of existing antiviral medications. Besides taking normal precautions for our hygiene and limiting time spent around birds, there isn’t much you or I could do, Talaat said.

So how worried should I be?

At the moment, it’s a watch and wait scenario.

“Quite frankly, I'm not worried about us in the United States,” Talaat said. Relatively few people are directly involved in handling birds, and the U.S. does not have open-air animal markets, which play a key role in starting and spreading zoonotic outbreaks. But that risk assessment would change if the virus was found to be spreading between humans. “That would definitely be a different story,” he said.

picrel:

"Lon" means black bird

babyLON

LONdon

eLON

etc…

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lon

Old Irish lon.

Noun

lon m (genitive singular loin, nominative plural lonta)

blackbird (Turdus merula)

Scottish Gaelic

Noun

lon m (genitive singular loin, plural loin)

blackbird (Turdus merula)

2 of 2

https://twitter.com/GDarkconrad/status/1635930219461726212

Manu Gómez

@GDarkconrad

Miscode UAV active off the coast of #Crimea.

https://twitter.com/GDarkconrad/status/1635929788727664640

Manu Gómez

@GDarkconrad

GPS Jammning in the #BlackSea.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1635936027389882370

Disclose.tv

@disclosetv

MORE - Credit Suisse’s top shareholder, the Saudi National Bank, rules out providing more financial assistance to the struggling Swiss bank, citing regulatory issues — Bloomberg

https://twitter.com/mislavkolakusic/status/1635944334989176833

Mislav Kolakusic MEP 🇭🇷🇪🇺

@mislavkolakusic

Today we are witnessing the burning of billions of doses of covid vaccines around the world 🌍 because no one wants them.

It would have been better if we had burned them all immediately and thus saved the health and lives of many citizens.❗️

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-bivalent-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-booster-dose

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine as Booster Dose for Certain Children 6 Months through 4 Years of Age

Immediate Release:

March 14, 2023

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration amended the emergency use authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent to provide for a single booster dose of the vaccine in children 6 months through 4 years of age at least 2 months after completion of primary vaccination with three doses of the monovalent (single strain) Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.

What Parents and Caregivers Need to Know:

Children 6 months through 4 years of age who completed their three-dose primary series with the monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine more than two months ago are now eligible to receive a single booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent.

Since December 2022, children 6 months through 4 years of age who receive the first two doses with monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine should complete their three-dose primary series with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent. These children in this age group are not eligible for a booster dose of a bivalent vaccine at this time and are expected to have protection against the most serious COVID-19 outcomes. Today’s authorization is for those children 6 months through 4 years of age who completed their 3-dose primary vaccination series with the monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, before the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent was authorized to provide the third dose in the 3-dose primary series.

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent includes an mRNA component corresponding to the original virus strain to provide an immune response that is broadly protective against COVID-19 and an mRNA component corresponding to the omicron variant BA.4 and BA.5 lineages to provide better protection against COVID-19 caused by the omicron variant.

p1

>>18512184

“Today’s authorization provides parents and caregivers of children 6 months through 4 years of age who received the three-dose primary series with the monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine an opportunity to update their children’s protection by receiving a booster dose with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent,” said Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. “Currently available data show that vaccination remains the best defense against severe disease, hospitalization and death caused by COVID-19 across all age groups, and we encourage all eligible individuals to make sure that their vaccinations are up to date with a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine.”

FDA Evaluation of Available Effectiveness Data

For the authorization of a single booster dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent for children 6 months through 4 years of age at least 2 months after completion of primary vaccination with three doses of the monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, the FDA evaluated immune response data from 60 children in this age group who had completed primary vaccination with three doses of monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and received a booster dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent in a clinical study. One month after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent, the study participants demonstrated an immune response to both the original SARS-CoV-2 virus strain and to omicron BA.4/BA.5.

In addition, the authorization is supported by the FDA’s previous analyses of the effectiveness of primary vaccination with the monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in individuals 16 years of age and older and individuals 6 months through 4 years of age, and previous analyses of immune response data in adults greater than 55 years of age who had received one booster dose with an investigational Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine (original and omicron BA.1).

p2

>>18512184

>>18512186

FDA Evaluation of Available Safety Data

The safety of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent as a booster dose in children 6 months through 4 years of age at least two months after completion of primary vaccination with three doses of the monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is based on the following safety data previously evaluated by the FDA:

A clinical study which evaluated a booster dose with Pfizer-BioNTech’s investigational bivalent COVID-19 vaccine (original and omicron BA.1), in individuals greater than 55 years of age,

Clinical studies which evaluated primary vaccination with the monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in individuals 6 months of age and older,

Clinical studies which evaluated booster vaccination with monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (previously, but no longer, authorized) in individuals 5 years of age and older, and

Postmarketing safety data with the monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent.

In addition, among individuals 6 months of age and older, safety was assessed in participants in two clinical studies. In one study participants 6 months through 11 years of age who were previously vaccinated with a 3-dose primary series of monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine received a booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID 19 Vaccine, Bivalent. Among 24 participants 6 months through 23 months, the most common side effects included irritability, drowsiness, injection site redness, pain and swelling, decreased appetite, fatigue, and fever. Among 36 participants 2 years through 4 years of age, the most common side effects included fatigue, injection site pain, redness and swelling, diarrhea, vomiting, headache, joint pain, and chills. Among 113 participants 5 through 11 years of age, the most common side effects included, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, joint pain, chills, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, injection site pain, swelling and redness, and swelling of the lymph nodes in the same arm of the injection. In another study, 316 participants 12 years of age and older who were previously vaccinated with a 2-dose primary series and a single booster dose of monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, received a second booster dose with the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent. The most commonly reported side effects by the participants in this age group were the same as those reported by the participants in the 5 through 11 years age group.

The safety data accrued with the investigational bivalent vaccine (original and omicron BA.1) and with the monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine are relevant to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent because these vaccines are manufactured using the same process.

The fact sheets for recipients and caregivers and for healthcare providers include information about the vaccine’s potential side effects, as well as the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis.

The amendment to the EUA was issued to Pfizer Inc.

3 of 3

>>18512123

>>18512058

federally guaranteed student loans equate to government sponsored brain washing. and fleecing, as whatever they charge, a govt back loan will foot the students' tuition, room, board, and fees.

Max Igan Clif High

re: old diggers

Disclose.tv

@disclosetv

JUST IN - Trading halted for French banking group BNP Paribas after the stock plunged 8%.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1635945741335121921

kanekoa.substack.com

@KanekoaTheGreat

.

@RobertKennedyJr

tells

@jimmy_dore

: "Trump got in there and said I'm going to get rid of the swamp. He asked me to be on a vaccine safety commission. When that news got out, Pfizer gave him $1 million for his inaugural party, and he appointed two of Pfizer's lobbyists, Scott Gottlieb and Alex Azar, to run HHS. They killed the vaccine safety commission, and Gottlieb went on to serve on Pfizer's board.

The thing that I feel like I have, Jimmy, is that I sued those agencies for forty years; I know how they work, I've written books about them, I've studied them, I know the people in them who are causing the problems, I know how to fix them."

https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1635418049187840001

>>18512281

^^^^^^^strong delusion sufferer.

>>18512287

wonder where they source it and have soruced it since at let WWII or all of tthese controlled studies, eh?

Adrenochrome as the cause of schizophrenia: investigation of some deductions from this hypothesis (1955)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13263847/

THE EFFECT OF ADRENOCHROME AND

ADRENOLUTIN ON THE BEHAVIOR OF

ANIMALS AND THE PSYCHOLiOGY OF MAN (1962)

https://anatomiadaconsciencia.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/adrenochrome_adrenolutin_effect_animal_man-hoffer1962.pdf

Hallucinogens as hard science: the adrenochrome hypothesis for the biogenesis of schizophrenia (2010)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20533770/

The Adrenochrome Hypothesis and Psychiatry

A. Hoffer, H. Osmond

Published 1990

Chemistry

Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine

The adrenochrome hypothesis of schizophrenia (Hoffer, Osmond and Smythies, 1954), was stimulated by the work of Osmond and Smythies (1952) which focused on methylated derivatives of adrenalin as possible endogenous schizophrenogens.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Adrenochrome-Hypothesis-and-Psychiatry-Hoffer-Osmond/f8373571fe33cefd53780e56df06f1e079ec4e95

THE EFFECT OF ADRENOCHROME ON

SYMPATHETIC NERVE STIMULATION (1946)

https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004305

The Chemistry Of Adrenochrome And Related Compounds (1959)

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Chemistry-Of-Adrenochrome-And-Related-Compounds-Heacock/95a027da8e30768f376c906db854651fe0b495f1

Schizophrenia and cancer: the adrenochrome balanced morphism (2004)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14975514/

there are MANY more…