People always think they know more than they do.
Have you ever heard of the whipping boy? It's a classic human behavior. There are variations on the theme, but when bad things happen and no one wants to deal with the inconvenience of addressing the root cause of the problem or their own part in said problem, they have a whipping boy to beat. In some cultures, a goat is accused of being a shape shifter. In other cultures, there is a child or man held in exile outside the village.
Naturally, most people don't talk without believing they are offering something worth saying, or… worse… believing that the expression of their sentiment is of importance. So, everyone is egotystical, it's just that only the properly pure can indulge in sin. As it ultimately becomes in all religions. Purity is the weapon used to gatekeep. The most ardent hedonists don the purest of robes and indulge in the praise of the masses.
It's pretty simple. We are all responsible for what we choose to engage with and how we choose to engage. There are people here who are more concerned with how pure someone is by their standard than with whether or not things get done.
Does it particularly matter if anime baker is AFLB? What if anime baker is a consortium of people who agreed to behave the same? Does it change anything?
If BO ends up following the sentiments of the types who are arguing against anime baker, I can guarantee you that is the end of the board, as such people do not possess any self control or much in the way of intellectual relevance. This will just be a mirror of notables on pol's DJT thread and this place won't even be an interesting bible study group.
That cargo cult of purists believes that, by ritual, they can control what Q is or somehow actualize Q as the vindication of their convictions. Nothing could be further from the truth and they will fail at their objective even when successful in their methods.
The same goes for the various other actors who have tried to harness Q.
And for those who believe it can be shut down or stopped…. well, how can you be sure you can stop something you don't understand?
"POTUS has opened the door of doors"
… everyone wants to know what is behind the door… but who has seriously stopped to ask who built the door and why that door existed? Why not a wall?
Worded more directly, what is behind a door such that it needed to be sheltered, but accessible?
What was the purpose of Q?
What comes next?