>>18519612

Point taken. Here's the problem. Trump is pro-Jew generally. Q seems pretty pro-Jew in most cases. Q does not want anons divided, and yet Q wants anons to be aware of enemies. So … how exactly can anons talk about "globalist" infiltrators without being accused of "dividing"?

One way is to quote the very small number of anti-Israel things that Q wrote, such as "saving Israel for last" or that one cartoon that showed a Jew in an ocean of blood.