I love it when you arse kiss the baker. .Pic rel.
That being said, anon likes compact buns.
Awaiting the tranny onslaught from those that have never seen or felt a real woman's arse irl.
>Can post one to self-identify
Please don't!
Some anons have had quite enough unwanted kiddie cartoon images rammed down their throats like unwanted penises.
>stop the slide, it's over.
As long as its infantile fetish, despite anon objections, has been curtailed, anon is comfy.
Kek
The MSM loves those phrases, which anon always translates as fear mongering bullshit.
>Only the selfless make it to the top of The Mountain.
Not a student of history, anon notes.
Hopefully, it will become a truism in the future, but anon is not holding his breath as larceny and deception have proved so useful in the past in all walks of life.
>You are not here to help us, Pig. You are here to sell yourself. Filtered forever more on first sight.
Tardy to the party, anon.
Name/famefags have thusly been dealt with for a long time.
>it is assumed that restitution will be made to the american small business owner for their loss in this clusterfuck?
Affirmations do not a question make.
>congrats Mr. Pig
Dubs confirm that socks and associates will receive the same treatment as the OP
Please post the grammar rule that states an affirmation becomes a legitimate question with the addition of an interrogatory punctuation mark.
TIA
Methinks English teacher wins this round. Next!
Ever hear of the Turing test?
>a retarded faggot test proposed by a retarded faggot.
Faggot? Yes!
Retarded? Doubtful!
Autist?
Probable.
You paint autists as faggots?
Do you know where the fuck you are?
Or, should the question be do you know what aware actually means?
>I never explain what I say. You either get it or so sorry.
Not sure what you want to say. Could you clarify?
>the "Turing Test" is 100% SUBJECTIVE
Goddamn, anon is all ears to hear your scientific alternative.
Would that be via the historic scientific method or the modern one?
>Not sure if Stormy being a cult victim is sauced or not.
The NXIVM brand was first posted way, way, back when.
Legitimate?
In this crazy story, who knows, anon never sought verification, merely stored it as a potential truth that could/would come into play later on in this movie script.
> your pathetic attempt to deflect attention away from the central issue has been noted, faggot.
Remind anon what the central issue is. It seems we have deviated.
>is the turing test valid?
>or is it retarded?
Or, can we identify AI posts or are we helpless?
>is the turing test valid?
>or is it retarded?
Or, can we identify AI posts or are we helpless?