Have we considered the nanoparticle angle on Au-Ag?

I just found this:

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/prechem.2c00007

Title: (AuAg)44(SPhtBu)26 versus (AuAg)44(SPhF2)30: Tailoring the Geometric Structures and Optical Properties of Nanocluster Analogues

Maybe the scientific types can see if this means anything, perhaps in light of it coming out in a Pfizer doc that graphene oxide was used in the jabs.

https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/125742_S1_M4_4.2.1-vr-vtr-10741.pdf - page 7, section 3.4

>>18537523

I found another one.

https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-10-239

Title: Medical Virology of Hepatitis B: how it began and where we are now

In this one, it says: "The history of modern research on viral hepatitis began in the year 1963, when Nobel Prize winner Baruch S. Blumberg (1925–2011) reported for the first time publicly on the discovery of a new antigen named Australia antigen (AuAg). In the years following, AuAg would become the first specific marker of viral hepatitis. Thereafter, viral hepatitis type B became a driving force for the development of modern virus diagnostics and vaccines. This article will recapitulate the major advances in the field of hepatitis B research throughout the last 50 years and point out some perspectives for future research."

Also, "Today’s hepatitis B vaccine was the first vaccine produced by gene technology."

Is this the same one that kids have been taking for decades now? Yikes!

If we went back through all of the Q posts, I wonder how many of them we would now discover actually had something to do with the plandemic….

>>18537693

Who knows. That one message could still go out. Did you see his YouTube video? It sounded like an encoded message to me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcpjvVFAayo

"sorry to keep you waiting complicated

business complicated"