The delusional marxists claim that anyone who isn't on their side who protests will spurge off into violence.

What they are doing is projecting and admitting to their own violent natures.

the violence of the rhetoric is metaphorical.

In their minds any one protesting against them should be treated as a violent criminal and 'put down' by their corrupt fake-justice.

Seriously these people are criminals in their heart, authoritarians, and absolutists.

They ought to be reminded of what those who they supported were doing back during Donald Trumps years in office.

>>18539146

a nonviolent way to protest:

when you have a URL you can add a message to it with an amperstand and then a string of characters to send a message that will be in the URL, but not effect the workings of the server (unless they are using it as a session variable).

so, if President Trump is in jail you could do something like

amperstand (the character) MY_PROTEST_FREE_PRESIDENT_TRUMP

do a hundred google searches that all say 'Free Donald Trump' and stuff like that.

from your chair

in your office

>>18539182

slander.

why don't you try prayer and find out for yourself, or do you think you'll burst into flames?

>>18539198

wrong.

why would God eradicate people who might come around later on?

Sinners reform.

God love all.

A reformed sinner becomes a pillar of the community.

you ought to go back and learn, and stop spouting nonsense.

"Spring Starts: Monday, Mar 20 5:24 pm EDT"

from:

https://www.calendardate.com/spring_2023.htm

Slander against peaceful protestors, and tagging them as violent, is the very definition of sedition and of a terrorist mindset.

>>18539213

a joke:

viagra is a gain of boner drug

another point: the accusation of protesters of the opposition as being violent, when they are not, is an attempt at civil rights suppression: it is an attempt to not allow a right to assemble.

in that sense it's a serious Civil Rights violation to slander people in that way.

fortunatley free speech does allow it in a limited capacity.

if you brought that to a judge and putdown a protest based upon that false assumption you'd then be an actual violator of the civil rights of those peaceful protesters.

And so those loud mouths of the left who make that kind of slander ought to take care as to how far they push that false accusation, and how they use that slander to violate the rights of their oppostion.

>>18539223

I say 'fortunately' in the sense that sometimes people are just spouting off, and aren't taking it to the next level and getting judges to issue orders, and authorities to issue warrents.

fortunate in that it doesn't clog up the courts with all the slanders of loose-cannon-mouth apperatchicks and parrot-mouthed operatives.

There must be a point when they slander crosses a line and becomes actual suppresion of rights under the color of law, and those who think that their bombast is cute, and effective, ought to be warned: the nonviolent are watching what they do and seeing the violence caused by the slander and are not impressed.

>>18539246

the solution is to take those who go after the nonviolent protestors and put them up to trial under civil rights laws: the suppression of the right to assemble under the color of law.

put the judges, and authoritarians in prision.

Not all judges and prosecutors are criminal minded marxists.

it's only those that ened to be mitigated and put out of their offices, either by forcing them to resign or prosecuting them and putting them into a situation where they will no longer be a menace to the rights of others.

It's has to happen in the courts and in the offices of prosecutors.

It's a 'war in Heaven' kind of thing.