>>18541041 (pb)

>chronic exposure

Why would you be exposed chronically?

Have you read the treatment protocols?

There is at least 1 study re: Japanese children being exposed chronically for months. Nothing happened. In fact they were less sick than the other group. If they all died 3 months later, I'm pretty sure that would have made it into the study. And if they all died 3 years later, I guess someone would have done an update.

Maybe they all die because of exposure 100 years later?

Got a duration how fast you get problems? 50 years? Is it as deadly as corona?

>the situation MIGHT be a little different if there were not a 1001 BETTER ways to treat systemic infections.

Okay, lists all of them.

And their price too, must be lower than ClO2 "better". ClO2 is dirt cheap.

I will be nice, only list 101 of them. That's 10% of your claim.

>>18541996

>>18542028

>This is an interesting phenomenon, sort of like them calling Trump supporters Nazis

As well as unironically supporting real Nazis, and at the same time calling them not real Nazis, but at the same time wanting to kill all Russians, and then doing a follow up saying Russians are actually the Nazis.

>>18542061

Should have a 4th photo, Russians arresting Nazis, and the NPC going "Nazis!!!"

I unironically talked with someone like that today.

>evil Putin, also you are a pro-Putin shill and all the lies you post can be easily disproven

Okay, do you know about all the wars the US was involved in, tons of people killed, like Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq

>No, there were no illegal wars in Syria or Iraq

>this is just Russian propaganda

US military came and bombed, they weren't called by neither the population nor the government, so I consider that illegal

Also here, Albright saying that half a million dead children were worth it

>Well, those are dead now. Let's forget about those.

>but you defend and support (I never did) Putin's evil war where people get killed

>btw. Iraq is better off without Saddam anyway

>Well, those are dead now. Let's forget about those.

I couldn't stop laughing for minutes. It was surreal.

I'm really questioning if these are bots, or just insane humans.

>>18542148

Of course studies stating ClO2 would help against "covid-19" are really suspect.

What did they actually do there?

Is that patient someone with flu symptoms and a positive PCR test result?

I personally think covid-19 is just a renamed flu, but what do I know.

What is the flu would be the follow-up qiuestion?

Why does this or that work against "the flu"?

Is the flu a detox? Then it would make sense that an antidote would help the body end the detox procedure sooner.

So that would make sense, and it seems the same is said about Ivermectin, that it would help against "the flu" as well as "covid".

Of course it could all be BS.

In the end you have to do an experiment yourself, and you shouldn't do that unless you are really sure what you are doing and not having a problem getting harmed in the process.

And of course a reason to try it in the first place.

Some months ago I talked with a leaf about him wanting to try Ivermectin, but he had no health issues. And I went why would you want to try it anyway? Those are not sweets. Maybe they are really miracle drugs, but still no sweets and you shouldn't take them when there is no reason to do so.