#Q3113 #Q3114
Mar 18 2019 18:17:04 (EST)
What occurred the last time a countdown was presented?
[FF]
Do you believe in coincidences?
Never interfere with an enemy……..
Ammunition is hard to come by.
Q
…………………………………
Mar 18 2019 18:19:31 (EST)
https://twitter.com/infinitechan/status/1106894519859974144📁
Who is the real intended target?
Q
Mar 20 2019 13:45:07 (EST)
Ask yourself a very simple Q.
Would the FAKE NEWS media (& other controlled assets) expend this amount of time and resource attacking [attempt to discredit - cast as conspiracy - LARP] this movement IF IT DID NOT POSE A SIGNIFICANT THREAT [DANGER]?
YOU ATTACK THOSE WHO THREATEN YOU THE MOST.
Logical thinking.
Q
The World In 2017
20 → the year 2020
17 → Q
-
Their tower gets taken, completely by surprise
-
With Trump on the throne judgment is coming
-
Their World is a web, a tightly knit highly efficient machine
-
This is vulnerable when all our activity stops and people (are forced to) stop participating.
-
The people force the death of the bankster system.
-
It gets rebooted.
-
The vicious cycle has been broken, and the wheel of fortune has been turned.
-
And we are part of the planetary family of stars
Keep on going Anons. We will bring them to their knees. Just stay home and stop their system for a few days. Total stillstand for ten days and it is done!!
WWG1WGA
https://worldin.economist.com/edition/2017/article/12577/planet-trump
Planet Trump
worldin.economist.com/edition/2017/article/12577/planet-trump
''For liberals 2016 has been a grim year. A wave of populist anger has swept through the West, leading Britons to vote for a divorce from the European Union and Americans to elect as their 45th president a property magnate with no previous government experience who ran the most divisive and ugly campaign in modern American history. ''
''Within a few short months voters on both sides of the Atlantic delivered a powerful repudiation of their political establishment; shifted the fault lines of Western politics from left v right to open v closed; and voiced a collective roar of disapproval of globalisation, now shorthand for a rigged system that benefits only a self-serving elite. These are body blows to the liberal world order. Just how serious they are will become clear in 2017.''
Most important will be what kind of president Donald Trump turns out to be.
Take his words before and during the campaign at face value and the outlook is bleak. Mr. Trump is a long-standing economic nationalist, a man who believes free trade has destroyed America’s economy, who has cast doubt on America’s commitments to its allies and called for building a wall with Mexico and for restrictions on Muslim immigrants.
Although it seems unlikely that President Trump will try to enact all of this illiberal agenda, some of it will survive. His voters seemed to give Candidate Trump a lot of leeways, less interested in policy detail than the broad thrust of his message. The best outcome, once he is in office, would be for him to focus on his economic plans minus the protectionism. Big tax cuts coupled with a surge of spending from infrastructure to defence would bust America’s budget in the long term.
But in the short run, they would inject adrenalin into the economy. This might, just, be enough to keep the protectionism minimal, perhaps limited to a few token anti-dumping tariffs. The result would be a recipe similar to that of Ronald Reagan, a man whom much of the world viewed with alarm when he stormed to victory in 1980.
Even in this best case, a Trump presidency would take its toll on the open world order. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the biggest trade deal in years, is dead. Commitments made at the Paris climate-change accord look unlikely to be honoured. The Iran nuclear agreement could well wither. And the best case, on closer inspection, seems unlikely. The Gipper was a born optimist who believed in America as the shining city on a hill.
Mr. Trump’s appeal is rooted in anger and division. With Republicans in control of both chambers of Congress, his supporters will at a minimum expect barriers to go up, illegal immigrants to be deported and strict conservatives to be appointed to the Supreme Court. America will turn in on itself.
1/2
In the wider world, meanwhile, authoritarians will be ascendant, and keen to exploit America’s introversion. In China Xi Jinping, already the most powerful Chinese leader at least since Deng Xiaoping will use the Communist Party’s five-yearly Congress to consolidate his autocratic clout. He will lose little time in trying to fill the geostrategic air pocket left in Asia by the failure of TPP. In Russia, Vladimir Putin will bask in Mr. Trump’s attention but will disguise his vulnerability at home with foreign aggressions. Don’t expect any end to his attempts to destabilise Ukraine and the rest of Russia’s “near abroad”.
Boosted by Mr. Trump’s victory, Europe’s populist backlash will gather strength in 2017. Far-right parties will surge in both the Dutch and French elections and could, for the first time in the post-war era, take seats in Germany’s parliament. In what will feel like one long disgruntled election season, European politics will be dominated by scaremongering, about the dangers of migrants, the evils of trade deals, and the nefariousness of the European Union.
More terrorist attacks, which seem all too plausible, would darken the mood yet further. So would financial shocks: a fiscal crisis in Portugal and a flare-up of Italy’s chronic banking woes both seem likely. In such a febrile environment the Brexit negotiations will be slow, complicated, and cantankerous.
Tunnels end with light
This adds up to a dark year. Liberals should be worried. But the gloom will not last forever. Populist and isolationist policies eventually discredit themselves, because their consequences are disastrous. In a cruel irony, Latin America
—the region recently most associated with a backlash against liberal, open economics
—is once again shifting in a more liberal direction. Having tasted the disappointments that populism brings, Latin Americans are understandably sick of it.
The danger that this angry bout of Western nativism will intensify is also offset by deeper forces. Technology is forging global connections, whatever the backlash against migration or trade. Students study at foreign universities via online courses; small businesses export via online markets; people chat and share news on global social-media platforms. Younger voters raised amid these digital opportunities are keener on globalisation than their parents are; they voted against Brexit and Mr. Trump.
The question is not whether the world will turn back towards openness, but how soon
—and how much damage will be done in the meantime. The answer to that question depends above all on one man: Donald J. Trump.
2/2
BBC Radio 4 | Letter from America (October 10, 1986)
https://youtu.be/v13xKsCk1SY
Quiet Part, Out Loud – Polish Ambassador Warns If Ukraine Not Successful NATO Will Join War Against Russia
theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/03/19/quiet-part-out-loud-polish-ambassador-warns-if-ukraine-not-successful-nato-will-join-war-against-russia
March 20, 2023
''Stunningly, the Polish Ambassador to France Jan Emeryk Rościszewski said yesterday: “Either Ukraine will defend its independence today, or we will be forced to enter into this conflict,” sending a clear message that NATO will enter the war against Russia if Ukraine loses ground.''
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5j_tVO8noU
Rościszewski essentially said the quiet part out loud, and that public statement immediately caused the NATO allies to recoil. https://www.yahoo.com/news/polish-ambassador-france-poland-forced-201021342.htmlThe EU NATO allies were not recoiling due to the substance of what he said, but rather because he said it publicly. Keep in mind, Jan Emeryk Rościszewski has been Poland’s Ambassador to France for about a year, and before that, he was the Chairman of the Board of PKO Bank Polski, Poland’s largest bank (WEF linkage).
The exact quote: “either Ukraine will defend its independence today, or we will have to enter this conflict. Because our main values, which were the basis of our civilization, and our culture will be threatened. Therefore, we will have no choice but to enter the conflict.”
The immediately triggered retreat by the EU IS HERE. However, this statement happened on the same day Politico reported: “NATO is racing to arm its Russian borders. Can it find the weapons?” https://www.politico.eu/article/nato-is-racing-to-arm-its-russian-borders-can-it-find-the-weapons-eastern-edge-military-leaders-james-j-townsend-jr-us-one-billion-citizens-army-europe/
[…] “Military leaders this spring will submit updated regional defense plans intended to help redefine how the alliance protects its 1 billion citizens. The numbers will be large, with officials floating the idea of up to 300,000 NATO forces needed to help make the new model work. That means lots of coordinating and cajoling. (link)
NATO wants to put 300,000 troops on Russia’s border, and yet they simultaneously pretend not to want an expanded war against Russia.
Put these data points together and what clarifies the intent of the western NATO alliance to increase the opportunity for expanded war.
Then overlay the western banking crisis and the issues with the intended Western outcome of a digital currency to support the larger World Economic Forum agenda. What starts becoming clearer is not only the positioning for an expanded war, but the motive to do so.
It all tracks neatly into place. The WEF agenda is to advance crisis and position the governmental actors to do the bidding of the WEF corporations that run them.
This is why the same map that shows the western countries supporting the Build Back Better, climate change, and energy policy goals,…. is the exact same overlay map of western countries who triggered sanctions against Russia…. which is the exact same overlay map of western countries that are now positioned with a Central Bank solution to a national banking crisis.
It’s all connected to the exact same motives and intents:
1/
It’s all connected to the exact same motives and intents:
Collapse energy development, stop oil, coal, and natural gas production. ''{create crisis}''
Trigger supply side, energy-driven, global inflation amid Western nations. ''{crisis ensues}''
Use Western Nation central banks to raise rates, and shrink economies to meet the lower scale of energy production. ''{crisis solution}''
♦
Raise interest rates to cause regional and national banks to collapse ''{create crisis}''
Central Banks step in to mitigate and nationalize/collate with fewer big banks ''{crisis}''
Introduce Central Bank Digital Currency ''{crisis solution}''
♦
Impose sanctions against Russia, cleave the globe based on energy production ''{create crisis}''
Create two economic models from energy collapse ''{crisis}''
Provoke war against Russia ''{crisis solution}''
''Western globalism…. It is all connected.''
2/
https://youtu.be/g5j_tVO8noU
Polish Ambassador to France: Ukraine Win or we will be forced to enter into this conflict.
0:21
3/3
>If the music doesn't fit the narrative it doesn't get airplay.
https://youtu.be/oTOnuiezOaM
GOOD RATS - TASTY
Camzilla
-
born Camilla Rosemary Shand, later Parker Bowles, 17 July 1947
Jillzilla
-
born Jill Tracy Jacobs, 03 June 1951
Mar 19, 2023 #TheJimmyDoreShow
Getting Ukraine to fight a war to the last Ukrainian in an effort to disable Russia without sacrificing a single U.S. soldier represents the “acme of professionalism.” That’s according to U.S. General Keith Kellogg, who argued in a recent Senate hearing that the U.S. is funding the Ukrainian military to disable Russia while preserving the nation’s capacity to fight China in the future.
https://youtu.be/LS1VlA38How
>General Keith Kellogg,
Joseph Keith Kellogg Jr. (born May 12, 1944) is a former United States government official and a retired lieutenant general in the United States Army.[1]
He previously served as the National Security Advisor to Vice President Mike Pence, and as the Executive Secretary and Chief of Staff of the United States National Security Council in the Trump administration.
He served as National Security Advisor on an acting basis following the resignation of Michael T. Flynn.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Kellogg