Cult logic right here

4635

Sep 08, 2020 1:46:22 PM EDT

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 19abcb No. 10566765

History repeats itself (today).

RE: IRREGULAR WARFARE

RE: TACTICS DEPLOYED v AMERICA

Compare & Contrast

Then v Now

https://www.britannica.com/topic/SA-Nazi-organization

Then: methods of violent intimidation deployed by SA

Now: methods of violent intimidation deployed by Antifa?

Then: battles raged in the streets [book burning, flag burning, destruction, hate, anti-police, etc]

Now: battles raging in the streets controlled by [D] party sympathizers [anti-republic]?

Then: physical assaults of political opponents

Now: physical assaults of political opponents?

Then: voter intimidation in National and local elections

Now: voter intimidation in National and local elections [coming 11.3]?

Then: project anti-fascist platform: reality: conform/obey strong-arm tactics deployed to silence opposing views

Now: project anti-fascist platform: reality: conform/obey strong-arm tactics deployed to silence opposing views?

Then: radical anti-capitalistic platform (socialism)

Now: radical anti-capitalistic platform (socialism) push?

Then: force economic destruction as recruiting [division] tactic to drive enlistment rate

Now: [D] party gov/mayor(s) close state(s) force economic hardships [C19]?

Then: SA carried out unchecked street violence against Jews and Nazi opponents

Now: [D] gov/mayor(s) carried out unchecked [deliberate non_prosecution orders 24-hour release] of Antifa rioters arrested [street violence – block-by-block takeover(s)]?

[D] gov/mayor(s) release of violent criminals [many thousands] from prison(s) under guise of C19?

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/nazi-propaganda

Use of propaganda by Nazi Germany

Use of propaganda by MSDNC / Social Media (control of narrative – terminate opposing message (censorship-kill))

Soros history

Assault on America.

Ask yourself, why are [D] party leaders refusing to condemn the violence?

Ask yourself, why are [D] party leaders refusing to seek a unified republic?

IT WAS NEVER ABOUT THE VIRUS AND ALWAYS ABOUT THE ELECTION

Was the Nazi party ever truly destroyed (eradicated)?

Did the belief carry-on [re-deployed]?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wzp2rpe06j8

Background of Soros?

Q

>>18546402

Risk of FF too high?

>>18546491

>no acceptance of FF (12) right now. eternal rejection for you posting this.

But you can only 'reject' for as long as you live. Eternally it is either true or false.

How is it false?

Did you not witness J6 FF?

>>18546616

>TOLJA TRUMP WAS CALLING FOR VIOLENT PROTEST

YOU LIE. HE NEVER SAID 'VIOLENT' YOU LYING SACK OF SHIT

>>18546640

Give them moar time to shift narrative!

>>18546836

Nope, you should have focused on what I said, fake news needs TWO MOAR WEEKS.

Now Blinken is repeating the Biden admin talking points spewed by John Kirby Last night.

Their narrative is that Putin and Xi’s attempts to stop the war in Ukraine is actually just a trick to keep the war going…

“War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is Strength.” -1984

NWO VS AMERICA + CHINA+ RUSSIA

Anon sees NWO losing this bigly.

>>18546880

BECAUSE HE'S SPEAKING ABOUT THE FACT TRUMP CANNOT 100% CONTROL THE PEOPLE AMD STATISTICALLY SPEAKING A PROTEST OF MILLIONS WILL HAVE FALSE FLAGS, AND PEOPLE DOING DUMB SHIT DESPITE TRUMP NEVER CALLING FOR VIOLENCE==

It's not "proof" that YOU called for violence if you suggest "protesting" and then someone else says "that's not a good idea, some people may get violent".

You aren't calling for violence just because other people 'define' what you said as asking for it.

As for the 'picrel', Wiesmann is implementing the communist Mao pattern, where if a person DOESN'T say certain words then they're guilty.

Weismann complaining that Trump didn't include the adjective 'peaceful' is rich considering how he was completrey silent when Democrats like Waters and Holder ACTUALLY CALLED FOR VIOLENT PROTESTS, al, on video.

You shills are stupid. You're defending actual calls for violence through omission, while falsely smearing the word 'protest' as necessarily violent.

The word 'protest' is by itself NOT a call to any violence.

You're the one being ridiculous.