Anonymous ID: 393f14 March 22, 2023, 11:45 a.m. No.18560563   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0570 >>0573 >>0579

>>18560519

>>18560518

Thank you both. Anon is familiar with the biblical rule about hooves, is that all there is to it? I see the statements rolled out again and again that 2 specific groups do not eat pork, but anon doesn't understand the significance other than religious…

 

Does it produce something of note or prevent something? If it's purely religious, so be it and maybe anon is digging in the wrong area.

Anonymous ID: 393f14 March 22, 2023, 12:01 p.m. No.18560667   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>18560592

Thank you anon. That adds details.

 

Is this rule merely religious in nature or is there some physiological effect that pork produces in humans that would potentially damage them or render them spiritually incapable? Is it the opposite?

 

Anon just wonders if the rule hides something or if it's just a way to determine the good 'ol boys club members?

 

Or does it taste like human and thereby destroys the joy of cannibalism?

 

Anon probably needs more sleep.