If you were involved in a life or death military operation
and a foreigner suddenly appeared within your ranks
immediately after 2 extremely successful battles
extremely vocal and desperate to help direct ops
would you think that was fine or a little strange?
If that person ignored your already successful team
and appointed themselves as head of operations and battles
2 days after arriving within your ranks
proceeding to order your battalion to go against what worked in the past
would you find that acceptable and go along with them?
If that person egotistically boasted that previous successful ops
were due to their expertise when you knew they weren't there in battle with you
would you find that normal and believe they were genuine?
If you saw that person ignoring intel and attempting to lead troops
in the wrong direction, and you went along with it
saying nothing not to cause division, what would that make you?
If that person suggested they had better ways of fighting
but you saw proof that their attempts before the next big battle
were failures, even when another team mate was lauding their expertise
Would you continue to keep quiet and go along with their plans?
Or would you speak out?
If you saw what was happening, and didn't alert your fellow fighters,
would that make you complicit? Would it make you a traitor?
would that mean you were a weak person?
would it mean that when your team was subverted, you stood back and did nothing?
would that make you proud of yourself, looking back?