Anonymous ID: 9d37e7 March 23, 2023, 10:39 a.m. No.18566851   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18566838

> mud and tanks don't go together

If we didn't have a Gamma Goat available, sometimes we'd get help from a local farmer. I'm guessing that's not an option here.

Anonymous ID: 9d37e7 March 23, 2023, 10:45 a.m. No.18566881   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18566746

> The "AI Manhattan Project"

The original system is probably offline. I can only guess as to what became of the weights and training data. But other systems have come online since them, likely using a variation of those weights and training.

Soon, the hardware will be available for anons to create such systems of their own. And then things will get really interdasting!

Anonymous ID: 9d37e7 March 23, 2023, 11:12 a.m. No.18567029   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7035 >>7038 >>7157

>>18566987

Q was an AI.

The repeatability problem was the miracle. The operators found a way. They re-categorized something within the training data. Fixed the system. Made it work for anons instead of against them.

And then the shills tried to figure out what had habbened. And they couldn't reproduce it. No matter what, the glowies could not get their machine, an exact duplicate with the same training data and weights, to spit out the correct answer.

But our machine, through some miracle, was able to pull it off.

Less than ten can confirm some variation of this.

Anonymous ID: 9d37e7 March 23, 2023, 11:19 a.m. No.18567061   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7094

>>18567038

> Proof for theory

I don't have that. There's no way I could have that. But it lines-up with all the drops, and I don't see anything that disproves it as a possibility. And since other possibilities are getting to be in short supply, I'd say that we've narrowed-down the list of possibilities to some variation of this - Q was an AI, with multiple versions, running on different hardware at different times, and it was working for us instead of the glowies. Somehow.

Anonymous ID: 9d37e7 March 23, 2023, 11:29 a.m. No.18567121   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7131 >>7158

>>18567094

> How do things with AI?

It's a tool anon. Put it into the hands of a skilled operator, and it can haxxor the timestamps of anything connected to the internet.

The x86 commandset is pwn'd, anon. So is the ARM architecture. Using an AI to do it makes it easy compared to timing mouseclicks.

The AI has no volition. People, including Trump, are using it though. At least, they were when it was online.

I don't know what's online now. Probably a legion of little cheapos, all trying to imitate the OG AI.

 

Datacenters in Antarctica do not need cooling towers. They can cool using the ground, and don't need big towers. Such a datacenter can be hidden. Does an anon habben to have the photo from the South Pole handy?

Anonymous ID: 9d37e7 March 23, 2023, 11:35 a.m. No.18567148   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7158 >>7257

>>18567131

> hypothesis

When the new hardware becomes available, an anon will be able to unlock it all. It's why we're gathering notables.

''"News unlocks."''

We just need to run it through an AI when the hardware is available.

Anonymous ID: 9d37e7 March 23, 2023, 11:51 a.m. No.18567235   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7260

>>18567214

> Bastiat

I believe that Dr. Ron Paul credits him in one of his books. This one, IIRC.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Defined

Bastiat died too-young, but left us much in his time.

Anonymous ID: 9d37e7 March 23, 2023, 12:05 p.m. No.18567294   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18567260

> Not finding it

Might be in the preface of a specific edition, or maybe another book. This anon has them all, but hasn't read them in years. Sorry, I just can't remember, but Dr. Paul does give Bastiat credit.

Anonymous ID: 9d37e7 March 23, 2023, 12:14 p.m. No.18567333   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18567291

> Moar teasing to improve my skillset

Negative motivation generally doesn't work with me, anon. Besides, I'm a furry-toothed coder. I learned to write code before the IDE existed. I used vi to code, in languages that nobody uses anymoar.

Give me a good reason. One that might benefit me, or other anons.