Russia Russia Russa
do I hear an echo?
Ah King Chuckie
isn't going to France after all for a great big state
dinner.
at Versailles
after 7 or more days of rioting.
I wonder if cake was to be on the menu, and would the people of France have let them eat it, anyway?
ah , echoing of
agreement between people all conforming:
how dare Q!!!
'weakling snowflakes'
'shock and awe campaign'
the people who agree with this are just wanting fireworks. More echoing.
'target on the back of Q'
and a gloss over about cognition and coming to useful decisions through parsing through what one discovers, which shows a lack of understanding about how people draw answers from events and circumstances.
'let the chips fall where they may' and a picture of some Florentine with breads supposed to be ? ? ? ? ? ? (we know Who, but it's not)
so much confirmation bias it's staggering.
what is your point:
That there is a conscious effort at pyschological operations by constantly chattering operators who discuss horrid disease as if it's common and easy to get?
That the psyoperators constantly chip away at the people who use the board through reminders, like when they flood porn;
like when they flood images of the same caliber, all with the same kinds of taint?
Like they did this bread with 'oh, Q should have pulled off the bandaide, let the world burn'?
is that what you mean? is that what we should notice.
that's why I often point it out.
then, usually , I get pig-piled and they go into attack mode.
I guess that is why there is a filter here, to shut them off if they are getting into our heads.
when you use operational words like 'seething', you loose all credibility in my eyes.
I can't get past the taint that has been placed on that word by vermin-shills constantly saying it here.
for example, last night, when the porn-gore-CP was being spammed for the duration of the latenight bread, a 'shut off images' was a very clear thing that helped one to stay and monitor the board.
the form of the vermin:
-
tell them to realize how stupid they are
-
claim truth is what you are are about.
-
tell them 'it's over' (what? what is over?)
-
tell them they have nothing (they are able to post, clearly they must have something.)
-
tell them they are an echo
they never discuss anything real.
It' just dropping coals on the heads of others.
no matter what is discussed the 'shill dominant' will post his put downs, of generic quality.
they are the ones who 'echo' the most.
and in this case the person posts it without directing it at anyone, like blasting a shot gun off into a flock of birds.
'place in', how so?
you can close the browser and do anything else when ever you want to do it.
if you think I'm a bot you are not being situationally aware.
again: the word 'seeth' and the word 'seething' are words that have been usurped by the psychological operators who fester on the board, and thus by using them you put yourself in their camp.
my point.
The country is not angry. They are patient and expectational.
you trying to 'stir the pot' does nothing, because you're transparent and obvious.
I was nice enough to say 'in my eyes' to not seem like I was saying that no one would ever take you seriously, but maybe I should have left that out.
you're a persona who is the 'rage against the evils of the world' personality hoping that your infecting others with your 'fall and die' behaviors.
'jump and die jump and die' is your mantra
the 'grammar' thing is the knit-picker persona, the know-it-all who can't help correcting everyone around him, and drives them all away by pretending to know all the rules, and enforcing them.
It's a known personality disorder that a psychologist might be able to cure.
I give you a first draft.
yes, I mean nit-picker, you are correct.
if this had been a document of instruction, then maybe someone would have been confused.
but it's not.
I wasn't talking about yarn, or making swetters.
you knew that.
but you were on topic, so.
that 'fake ancients' that is so popular these days really is a false view.
Romans were much better people than they come off as in British dramas.
a conversation with robots?
wow.
well you're wasting your time talking to me, then.
again: the word you used is spammed and it marks you as either being a victim of that use, so much so that you start using it, or you are part of the operation to spam the use of that word.
You should consider what I say because every time you use that word now you tag yourself as not a real anon, but as a manipulator and contributor to on-going psychological operations performed by people who, seemingly, lack love in their hearts.
I think you are a persona of discord, accusing others of what you really are.
That you said 'put into' means that you have no control over where you are, like a bot-persona would have no control.
if you are real then you need to step away from the tablet device and/or keyboard workstation and go somewhere to meditate.
breath and relax and stop imagining all this evil. You make up evil. you expect it, next thing it's knocking on your door.
yes, you are transparent and obvious.
; >
a joke:
my sister is a knit-picker,
she is an expert at picking out well crafted sweaters!
there is a 'too much information' point of view that real people have.
Anons may want full disclosure.
people you meet at the church, in the market, on the street: they want you to be polite and not steer your motions towards them.
there are places for debate, and other places for relaxing and sunbathing, recreation, and volley ball.
the 'rage against the evils of the world' persona doesn't really do well in any of those venues.
the one note you sing 'full disclosure' and anger at anyone who tells you to take a break from this today (this board, these posters, this venue, this bread) shows me that you're unware and just singing the same chorus over and over.
That's discordant, anon.
by saying 'persona' I mean, specifically, you're larping in a character: the rage against the world persona.
you know that character that screams out a window "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore" to no one in particular, just demonstrating frustration and extreme anger.
when you say this:
"You keep pretending the status quo is acceptable like you work for the fucking CIA or some shit."
you demonstrate more about what you are going on about.
my only message to you at the start of you spamming back to me was that the vocabulary you used, that specific word, is a trigger word used by operations of psychological discord.
I said nothing about 'status quo' or that three letter you mentioned.
Now you're going to play the victim card?
Just stop.
fairly typically for the angry rage head persona, when they get nowhere with it, to change over to the victim of injustice larper persona.
after that it's the 'Just make it stop' cry baby persona who is 'misunderstood' and wants to be comforted, blubbering through tears.
it's all fake, and well known.
as far as 'straw man?' not really. I picture myself more like the tinman.
PS: DOD does not own this site.
there may be operators in the field who message through these boards (it seems to me) in a righteous way.
also: if you were messaging anyone, they got your message.
I don't know who they are either , anon, and I'm not one of them. I'm here as an anon.
I don't attack, I comment and draw out your narratives to use what you provide as evidence as to what you are doing here.
but I can't really know, can I?
carry on.
now you're switched into an entirely different persona.
post what you want, I don't care.
I did tell you to 'carry on' meaning I've got no more for you right now, anon. what upsets you, that you're sad about your peepee, is TMI and I'm done trying to comprehend what you're about.
carry on.
if you want to improve your narrative:
-
never talk about your peepee
-
stop using operational phrases so frequently.
-
don't be a rage head.
this one is claiming something that I never said.
stop it.
I know not how you see it, and I thus can not 'see things' your way.