Anonymous ID: 5eba32 March 27, 2023, 7:53 a.m. No.18589140   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9213 >>9340 >>9605 >>9738

Navarro on Trump's DeSanctimonious Killshot & Weaponized Justice Department

 

Interviewed on Newsmax just prior to rally on Saturday

 

5-mins

https://rumble.com/v2f0h4w-navarro-on-trumps-desanctimonious-killshot-and-weaponized-justice-departmen.html

Anonymous ID: 5eba32 March 27, 2023, 8 a.m. No.18589174   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9752

>>18587586 pb

>ColonelVern … fenbendazole … decide for yourself

 

Fenbendazole as a Potential Anticancer Drug

 

Conclusion

These studies provided no evidence that fenbendazole would have value in cancer therapy, but suggested that this general class of compounds merits further investigation.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580766/

Anonymous ID: 5eba32 March 27, 2023, 8:59 a.m. No.18589405   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9605 >>9738

FULL SPEECH:

Matt Gaetz's Speech at President Trump Rally

in WACO, TX- 3/25/23

 

10-minutes

https://rumble.com/v2eru6u-full-speech-matt-gaetzs-speech-at-president-trump-rally-in-waco-tx-32523.html

Anonymous ID: 5eba32 March 27, 2023, 9:21 a.m. No.18589488   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9496 >>9605 >>9650 >>9738

Rudy W. Giuliani

Patriotism, Religion, Hard Work, Family.

 

The values and priorities that built this country and defined us as a nation for generations are are receding in importance.

 

We need good people with courage to step up. We can't continue to go down this path of self-destruction.

 

12:19 PM · Mar 27, 2023

https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1640388041222025216/photo/1

Anonymous ID: 5eba32 March 27, 2023, 9:23 a.m. No.18589496   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9542 >>9605 >>9738

>>18589488

Kayleigh McEnany

 

Astonishing and sad poll.

 

Will be covering this at the top of @OutnumberedFNC at noon. Join us!

 

Quote Tweet

4h

This is quite the graphic

https://www.wsj.com/articles/americans-pull-back-from-values-that-once-defined-u-s-wsj-norc-poll-finds-df8534cd

 

https://twitter.com/kayleighmcenany/status/1640386633139732484

Anonymous ID: 5eba32 March 27, 2023, 9:37 a.m. No.18589535   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9605 >>9738

Paul Sperry @paulsperry_·1h

 

1/2

Here aretough questions every WH correspondent would be shouting at Biden(if they weren't in the tank):

 

1) Have you ever spoken to your brother Jimmy about any foreign business dealings?

 

2) Have you and Jimmy shared any financial accounts? You & your son Hunter?

 

3) Can you assure the American people your son Hunter has divested his 10% stake in a Chinese investment fund?

 

4) Is Tony Bobulinski lying about your 2017 meeting in Beverly Hills?

 

5) Have you ever met w/ a rep from Burisma?

 

11:26 AM · Mar 27, 2023

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1640374634615848963

Anonymous ID: 5eba32 March 27, 2023, 9:49 a.m. No.18589591   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9605 >>9623 >>9738

NSA/CSS Thread on Section 702

@NSAGov

 

"I have seen firsthand how FISA Section 702 provides critical foreign intelligence that has kept our country and our allies safe"- @CYBERCOM_DIRNSA, GEN Paul Nakasone.

 

Read how 702 provides irreplaceable insights on our website and in the🧵to follow: https://nsa.gov/about/faqs/

 

  1. What is FISA Section 702?

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) is a key foreign intelligence authority that helps keep the United States, its citizens, and allies safe and secure. The authority allows the U.S. government to collect information from individual foreign intelligence targets located overseas who use U.S. electronic communications services such as email and telephone. Intelligence from Section 702 is used every day to protect the nation from critical threats, inform U.S. Government strategy, and save American lives.

 

  1. How does NSA decide which foreign persons to target with FISA Section 702?

NSA uses the authority to collect the communications of specified foreign targets likely to possess, receive, or communicate foreign intelligence information. NSA’s use of Section 702 authority is highly focused and limited - acquiring the communications of specific foreign actors overseas and using those details to answer intelligence requirements given to NSA by U.S. policymakers, such as illuminating terrorist plots, understanding the strategic intentions of China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran, and identifying cyber threats to the United States and its allies.

 

  1. Does NSA use FISA Section 702 to target Americans?

The exclusive focus of 702 is specific foreign persons who are physically located outside of the U.S. and who have or are likely to communicate foreign intelligence that satisfies the carefully vetted intelligence requirements of U.S. policy makers. The targeting of a foreign person with the goal of gathering the communications of an American is strictly prohibited. Other provisions of FISA address the circumstances in which the government may seek court approval to conduct electronic surveillance against an American.

 

  1. How does NSA ensure FISA Section 702 is compliant with the law?

The government has instituted many safeguards and levels of oversight to ensure that NSA uses FISA Section 702 lawfully and in a way that protects the privacy and civil liberties of Americans. These safeguards include a comprehensive and robust internal oversight program, as well as external oversight from all three branches of government, including by the U.S. Congress, federal judges, and independent review,

 

12:21 PM · Mar 27, 2023

https://twitter.com/NSAGov/status/1640388671336579072

Anonymous ID: 5eba32 March 27, 2023, 9:57 a.m. No.18589623   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9738

>>18589591

by the U.S. Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, which has issued public statements and reports on the effectiveness of NSA’s compliance program. In addition, the government has reaffirmed its commitment to using this authority in ways that protect the privacy and civil liberties of non-U.S. persons through Executive Order 14086.

 

  1. Is there an alternative foreign intelligence authority that could replace 702?

No, there is no substitute for 702. Much of the U.S. government’s most valuable intelligence, including from high-priority targets, relies on Section 702 collection. The authority, which expires in December 2023, provides irreplaceable insights into this country’s most pressing national security concerns. Since Congress enacted the authority in 2008, the U.S. Intelligence Community’s lawful and appropriate use of 702 has provided critical military and intelligence insights, including into some of the world’s most dangerous foreign actors.

 

Read more from the @ODNIgov here:

https://dni.gov/files/icotr/Section702-Basics-Infographic.pdf

 

With further resources on their site here: https://dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2023/item/2359-fisa-section-702-resources

Anonymous ID: 5eba32 March 27, 2023, 10:03 a.m. No.18589650   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9653 >>9738

>>18589542

>>18589542

>>18589488

Wall Street Journal March 27, 2023 5:30 am ET

==America Pulls Back From Values That Once Defined It, WSJ-NORC Poll Finds

Patriotism, religion and hard work hold less importance==

 

Patriotism, religious faith, having children and other priorities that helped define the national character for generations are receding in importance to Americans, a new Wall Street Journal-NORC poll finds.

 

The survey, conducted with NORC at the University of Chicago, a nonpartisan research organization, also finds the country sharply divided by political party over social trends such as the push for racial diversity in businesses and the use of gender-neutral pronouns.

 

Some 38% of respondents said patriotism was very important to them, and 39% said religion was very important. That was down sharply from when the Journal first asked the question in 1998, when 70% deemed patriotism to be very important, and 62% said so of religion.

 

The share of Americans who say that having children, involvement in their community and hard work are very important values has also fallen. Tolerance for others, deemed very important by 80% of Americans as recently as four years ago, has fallen to 58% since then.

 

Bill McInturff, a pollster who worked on a previous Journal survey that measured these attitudes along with NBC News, said that “these differences are so dramatic, it paints a new and surprising portrait of a changing America.’’ He surmised that “perhaps the toll of our political division, Covid and the lowest economic confidence in decades is having a startling effect on our core values.’’

 

A number of events have shaken and in some ways fractured the nation since the Journal first asked about unifying values, among them the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the financial crisis of 2008 and subsequent economic downturn and the rise of former President Donald Trump.

 

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/americans-pull-back-from-values-that-once-defined-u-s-wsj-norc-poll-finds-df8534cd

Anonymous ID: 5eba32 March 27, 2023, 10:08 a.m. No.18589674   🗄️.is 🔗kun

ICYMI from February 17, 2023

Approximately Zero

Masks make no difference in reducing the spread of Covid, according to an extensive new review by Cochrane—the gold standard for evaluating health interventions.

 

We now have the most authoritative estimate of the value provided by wearing masks during the pandemic: approximately zero. The most rigorous and extensive review of the scientific literature concludes that neither surgical masks nor N95 masks have been shown to make a difference in reducing the spread of Covid-19 and other respiratory illnesses.

 

This verdict ought to be the death knell for mask mandates, but that would require the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the rest of the public-health establishment to forsake “the science”—and unfortunately, these leaders and their acolytes in the media seem as determined as ever to ignore actual science. Before the pandemic, clinical trials repeatedly showed little or no benefit from wearing masks in preventing the spread of respiratory illnesses like flu and colds. That was why, in their pre-2020 plans for dealing with a viral pandemic, the World Health Organization, the CDC, and other national public-health agencies did not recommend masking the public. But once Covid-19 arrived, magical thinking prevailed. Officials ignored the previous findings and plans, instead touting crude and easily debunked studies purporting to show that masks worked.

 

 

In his book Unmasked: The Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandates, data analyst Ian Miller devotes an entire chapter to graphs exposing the CDC’s statistical malfeasance. He also prepared a graph for a previous City Journal article that is worth showing again, because it’s a visual confirmation—from nationwide data, not clinical trials—of the conclusions in the Cochrane review. The graph tracks the results of the natural experiment that occurred across the United States in the first two years of the pandemic, when mask mandates were imposed and lifted at various times in 39 states.

 

 

https://www.city-journal.org/new-cochrane-study-on-masks-and-covid