Anonymous ID: ab9a93 March 28, 2023, 12:25 p.m. No.18596803   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6808

>>18596733

Thanks Baker

 

The thing about bakers is, that they can hold the bake for 2 or 3 breads but then they must give the bake to someone else if asked, so any given baker can only censor so much for so long and if anons think it's still notable and baker disagrees? Just post it yourself for 3 breads. That's the same as getting a post in the notables but instead of having to mouse link view you can see the whole post. So, it's kind of a fake argument saying that one baker or another is censoring, because in reality they can't censor very much if anything at all in 3 breads. FYSA

 

This is all minor hiccup stuff being tossed around by drama shills. Anons get their messages out if anons think they're important. The world is watching.

Anonymous ID: ab9a93 March 28, 2023, 12:32 p.m. No.18596843   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6869

>>18596824

Normally this anon would agree 100% if anons weren't making leaps and bounds.

Anons have good chance to snag a whistleblower (turning over all the rocks) and if a connection to FBI/Psychiatrist/Pharma/Patient conspiracy is established?

This anons vote is keep turning over stones.

Anonymous ID: ab9a93 March 28, 2023, 12:45 p.m. No.18596930   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18596869

Agreed. The real coup would be whistleblower medical or law enforcement. Anons are beating the bushes. Who knows what will pop up?

Ask Alec Baldwin how that worked out for him.