That's one more than 17.
>the NWO is already here.
You gotta admit, they had a lot of distractions to keep the scam going (first pic related).
Stormy played her part perfect (second pic related).
>What in the actual fuck is the motivation behind the transgender movement?
It's complicated, but I'll give you an armchair observance if you wish. You need to dissect the alphabet soup of sexuality into their actual, distinct groups. And then once you do that, you'll eventually get to the real point.
Extremists/Mentally Insane/Rejectors of Nature's God:
The people that want to target your kids with sexuality, gender bending surgeries, hormones, and all that are basically an offshoot of "Satanists"; at least in the way that term gets thrown around here. They have targeted people that actually do suffer from gender dysphoria, confused sexuality, and a great deal of mental instability with tactics that mold them. Anons know all about this. For example, pic related. These people are propped up by relatives, strangers, counselors, and medical "professionals" to think they can literally change their gender entirely. All they need is drugs and surgeries to complete it. These people are falling prey to actual evil people, and the sooner they can get your hands on your kids, the better (for them) because if you want to change the future, you have to get to the kids. Everyone knows this (second screenshot related). If we're breaking everything down to "Good versus Evil", then these guys are some of the most evil there are.
Almost everyone else in the alphabet soup:
Most of the people in the "trans" ""movement"" aren't even in a """movement""". That's more of a Matt Walsh/Daily Wire attack vector to rile people up. It's ridiculous, and they've managed to marginalize a community that pretty much was just minding their own business before all this nonsense started. The old school trans guys that just want to put on their shows, have a good time, and stay strictly in their lane for adult entertainment mostly want to be left the fuck alone, and as far away from this entire discussion of the actual sick shit going on as possible. They have nothing to do with abusing kids, have given TV interviews on Tucker and other shows denouncing the behavior of these other people doing the drag show brunch shit and library readings. But, man are the ratings too good to pass up, so you don't get to hear that side of the argument often.
It's like what they tried to do with the gays/lesbians. For months there was a concerted effort for MAPs ("minor attracted persons") to attach themselves to LGBT. LGBT immediately rejected them, and even called them out, repeatedly, on social media. Their voices, believe it or not, also got silenced by Twitter before Elon's takeover. Gays Against Groomers did manage to get some airtime, and they frequented school board meetings along with parents denouncing the shit going on in schools.
Hope this helps. The "movement" aspect of this whole thing glows like a motherfucker. There are extremists, absolutely, and media is making these people out to be all the same to get otherwise "live and let live" types fighting each other. Fuck that noise. Parse out the crazies from the "I don't agree with you, but at least you are defending children, too" and see what they are trying to do to a free nation of people who value liberty and unity.
Be above this nonsense.
>I'm not a techie, what does this mean exactly?
It means that techie types will be reading the scripture of how the algos have magnified and silenced voices on a "free speech" platform. The entire internet of volunteers will then flood Twitter with objections to code "here and there" to help get it running the way it should. The platform, ultimately, "belongs to Elon" and it will be cleaned up (or not) in areas as he sees fit (according to how it's already been planned out).
Long/Short, it's a class participation event with the illusion that class participation helps with its improvement.
How much did people pay, previously, for newspaper and magazine subscriptions? There's an entire industry there where the money will leave those antiquated platforms where you get spoken to in exchange for a platform you get to participate in - YOU ARE THE NEWS NOW. US Media and Entertainment industry is valued at about 717 billion. A sizeable portion of that is the "news". That money is going to go somewhere as the legacy media continues to crumble. That's where platforms like "Twitter" come into play. It's pretty genius, really. Elon's even said this is his goal (in not as much detail).
Pay to play? Yes, for 8 dollars a month, you may eventually see ad revenue trickle towards your timeline for providing "content" to your "subscribers". This is how you take down the big names that are attempting to prop themselves up in the wake of orgs like Fox, MSNBC, and others (think DW).
<3
taps you on shoulder
Yeah, it takes a minute for the plan to unfold, but it's more of a permanent solution than others.
https://twitter.com/realtoriabrooke/status/1641789248889139201
KASH PATEL: "DA Alvin Bragg and his team of bandits will be shown to have lied to a grand jury, misrepresented evidence, hid evidence of innocence and exoneration and lied to the world in trying to achieve a political prosecution. That in and of itself will destroy any Democratic movement that tries to counter man this movement that @realDonaldTrump
is now going to lead. They hate corruption in the judicial system; we showed it to them in Russiagate and half the country still doesnโt believe it happened. Now President Trump is going to show it to the WORLD from the epicenter of the globe in New York."
#TheWorldIsWatching
"Bring your sources or fuck off" will become a mantra, and those old sources will dry up when the funds are no longer available. Power of information to the people. Wikipedia is a great idea. The problem with that idea is when people makeup bullshit, call it a "study" and it's used/quoted as a "source" in Wiki articles. This new trend that Twitter is leaning into will destroy that, and make Wikipedia an ongoing information flow. It's already happening. People come on the platform, say something, and it's either hailed as true, or immediately "debunked". The line between bullshit and fact is becoming more clear by the day even if it appears to be even more chaotic than before. It'll even itself out as things continue to unfold.
It doesn't matter. They have to eventually deal with it publicly and any move they do will hasten the eventuality of the outcome.
Precisely. They are scrambling, but eventually it will see the light of day.
Order is important. Notice SA was first; the deals/arrangements made, etc. The dollar was never backed by oil. The oil was a facade to mask human/drug trafficking WW. The debt the system created was being financed by other world governments. You don't just jack a few banks up and flip them. You have to surgically fix that system and restructure it without causing the entire thing to put the USA in a position where it all collapses on itself. BRICS (plus, now, France to an extent) is part of that. When US oil and LNG production starts to ramp up, you'll see what happens. A country that's truly wealthy doesn't base its currency on debt. It bases it on what it can produce that others want/need.
"Gold" will end the fed? Liquid gold. Actual gold.
It's a lot easier to understand the possibility of "the plan" if you think about everything that's happening as a series of traps. Note Q didn't say trap, but responded to it. When Biden "took office", our fren made another post confirming their position on the trap thing with an image of the capitol with fencing all around.
-
Get yourself some traps.
-
Get some bait.
-
Set 'em up.
-
Wait.
This is the general answer/theme of most questions asked. Ask yourself, "Does my question fit into this framework?" Maybe it does. Maybe it doesn't (yet).