Judge Authorizes Manhattan DA Bragg to Make Trump Indictment Public

A New York judge on Friday authorized DA Alvin Bragg to make the Trump indictment public.

“A judge has authorized the Manhattan district attorney to disclose to the public that the grand jury has returned an indictment in the case of former President Donald Trump, according to a court document.” Reuters reported.

Trump has been accused of paying porn star Stormy Daniels, AKA, Stephanie Clifford, ‘hush payments’ through his then-attorney Michael Cohen in a scheme to silence her and stop the story about their alleged affair from being published in the National Enquirer.

The payments made to Stormy Daniels did NOT come from Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

A Manhattan Grand Jury voted to indict President Trump anyway.

The indictment is currently under seal, however, according to a leak to CNN, President Trump was hit with 34 counts related to business fraud.

It is unclear when Alvin Bragg will make the indictment public, according to Reuters.

Trump is expected to be arraigned on Tuesday at 2:15 PM ET in New York City on the trumped up charges.

Trump will not take a plea deal in the Stormy Daniels ‘hush payment’ case, according to the former president’s lawyer, Joe Tacopina.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/03/developing-judge-authorizes-manhattan-da-bragg-to-make-trump-indictment-public/

New Bragg Letter on Trump Indictment Accuses House Republicans of Collaborating with Trump to ‘Vilify’ Prosecutors and Judges

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D) again pushed back against House Republicans’ efforts to investigate his prosecution of President Trump, with his office sending a scathing letter Friday morning boasting about his indictment of Trump and accusing them of “collaborat(ing) with Mr. Trump’s efforts to vilify and denigrate the integrity of elected state prosecutors and trial judges and made unfounded allegations that the Office’s investigation, conducted via an independent grand jury of average citizens serving New York State, is politically motivated.”

The letter is the latest in a back and forth between House Committee Chairmen Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Justice; Rep. Brian Steil (R-WI), Administration and Rep. James Comer (R-KY), Oversight.

Excerpts:

Dear Chairman Jordan, Chairman Steil, and Chairman Comer:

Yesterday, the District Attorney of New York County filed charges against Donald Trump for violations of New York law.1 The charges filed yesterday were brought by citizens of New York, doing their civic duty as members of a grand jury, who found probable cause to accuse Mr. Trump of having committed crimes in New York.

Like any other defendant, Mr. Trump is entitled to challenge these charges in court and avail himself of all processes and protections that New York State’s robust criminal procedure affords. What neither Mr. Trump nor Congress may do is interfere with the ordinary course of proceedings in New York State. Your first letter made an unprecedented request to the District Attorney for confidential information about the status of the state grand jury investigation—now indictment— of Mr. Trump. Your second letter asserts that, by failing to provide it, the District Attorney somehow failed to dispute your baseless and inflammatory allegations that our investigation is politically motivated. That conclusion is misleading and meritless. We did not engage in a point-by-point rebuttal of your letter because our Office is legally constrained in how it publicly discusses pending criminal proceedings, as prosecutorial offices are across the country and as you well know. That secrecy is critical to protecting the privacy of the target of any criminal investigation as well as the integrity of the independent grand jury’s proceedings.2

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/03/new-bragg-letter-on-trump-indictment-accuses-house-republicans-of-collaborating-with-trump-to-vilify-prosecutors-and-judges/

Wisconsin Cyber Security Expert Shocks Audience – Admits Wisconsin’s Voting Machines Can Be Hacked, Compares This to Act of War

The Supreme Court Race will determine the control of the Court that currently consists of 3 constitutional conservatives, 3 radical liberal progressives and one swing vote that rules with the conservatives the majority of the time.

With constitutional conservative Justice Roggensack retiring, it is critical that this open seat be filled with another constitutional conservative in the form of Justice Dan Kelly (2016-20) who is running an excellent campaign under very trying circumstances as the Big Tech Billionaires and their friends are funneling millions of dollars into the race to further their efforts of the “great reset” for America by hopefully winning this key race.

Radical liberal progressive candidate, No Jailtime Janet Protasiewicz, continues her attack on shredding the constitution and judicial ethical standards by promising to legislate from the bench, if by a miracle she is elected to the Supreme Court in Wisconsin, that will automatically unwind many of the highly successful legislative reforms passed in Wisconsin since 2010.

The Wisconsin Election Commission and Staff rarely, if ever, make public appearances unless the event is highly controlled and scripted by limiting their exposure to the public.

The administration of Wisconsin elections has come under very heavy scrutiny since 2020 when the Presidential election was supposedly decided by 20,682 votes with a middle of the night voter dump. The Gateway Pundit has disclosed many of those highly questionable aspects of that election.

It came as a huge surprise then and the timing was highly questionable, when it was learned that the Wisconsin Election Commission and Staff would appear with a group of expert election panelists earlier this week at two “Trusted Election Forums” after assuring Wisconsin voters for over two years how safe and secure elections were administered, especially on the eve of the April 4th statewide election.

To the shock and amazement of attendees, near the end of the forum, a widely respected and highly credentialed cyber security election expert domiciled in Wisconsin, Dave Schroeder, finally disclosed, after many years of direct and indirect denials by Wisconsin election administrators, that Wisconsin voting machines can be hacked and that this could be considered an “act of war”.

Schroeder’s background involves Wisconsin Army National Guard Cyber Warfare and an Information Warfare Officer with the Navy for Cryptologic Warfare and Space Cadre.

Schroeder went on to compare these hacks as a threat to the national critical infrastructure of America similar to attacks on the power grid, ports and dams.

Schroeder concluded that America’s “constitutional federal republic” is under threat from foreign forces.

How refreshing that someone finally states the obvious regarding voting machines in Wisconsin.

Let’s hope the legislators in Wisconsin are listening and will immediately ask to meet with Dave Schroeder to learn how the machines can be hacked, to see if they have been hacked and what can be done to implement election integrity firewalls for all Wisconsin voters.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/03/wisconsin-cyber-security-expert-shocks-audience-admits-wisconsins-voting-machines-can-be-hacked-compares-this-to-act-of-war-video/