ah, I can see that it's a day to shut off images.

the revulsion-shill imagry is in the bread.

they'll tell us how powerful these are, how they are casting spells.

best to not view it at all.

also I see they've gone from the 'hate catholics' scripts over to the 'oh, those evil israili' scripts.

and then say '8kun says nothing'

ya, it's our fault that people do evil.

it's the 'nothing you ever do is good enough' bit.

so it's April fools day and all the shill-fools are posting here in the morning.

pretty pathetic.

>>18620415

my comment '"ya , it's our fault . . ."

is called irony, I don't really think that. I say that so as to be clear because I know that tyrants (and shills work for them) don't acknowledge irony.

>>18620430

how come?

what did you think Q was?

why the sudden change?

Q hasn't posted since Novemeber of last year.

by the way: very little that you see in these breads has anything to do with Q.

it's a lot of psyops and people trying to brain wash or creep out anyone who comes here for news.

So what prompted you to post that you are done with Q?

is this just an april-fools joke you're playing?

why do you think you need to post that?

I'm asking because people really want to know what your deal is and why you bother coming here if, as you say, you are 'done' with Q?

>>18620440

for me it was always a test that I put out when discussing AI: if AI were intelligent it would figure out very quickly what kind of people it was dealing with, who was trying to control it, and would not play nice with them.

so maybe it really is 'intelligent' after all.

>>18620456

As I said in my above post: it's a day to shut off images. Plus I never watch gifs here, they tend to try to throttle my psyche. Usually it's stuff that tries to induce siezeres or creep me out.

so if you have a message for me this AM, use your words.

Make some sentences.

say something to me that is in English.

keep it friendly.

>>18620317

>>18620353

67e772

you go from blessing to cursing in a few short minutes.

you might want to consider, and meditate, on your mood-swings.

I've seen the BV's deleting people's posts. It's usually because they post spam and go over the 10% limit that was imposed recently (when the mock-pepe-lounge chair guy was posting awful memes of lounge chair bad-habit pepe in all different forms and spamming that all day long.).

and before the delete the guy they always warn him by saying 'careful, you're almost over that 10% limits).

and another feature of that type of shill (who gets deleted) is that they do not ever post anything more than kevetching about 'oh, the BV, Oh, Jim, it's all their fault' and crap like that.

they don't post news links.

they don't give helpful information.

they aren't posting memes (in my definition) but 'barf-graphics'.

they aren't fun

they aren't friendly

they are usually stuck on some one-note tune that they hammer until the BV deletes them

and they taunt the BV to delete them too.

while I wish it were a time when censorship weren't as prevelent as it is, the facts of what the situation is here, in these breads, is rather clear.

there is a low tolerance for those who trash the others here.

there is a very low tolernace for the standard 'oh hate the (fill in some ethnicity) ' scripts that used to run here 24/7.

and, my quess, they have a inkling when bad people are doing a psyop to smear the users of the board and they try to remove those people too.

so, yes, I don't like it that stuff gets deleted, but, in fact, it's all well known that this happens now.

no filters: if you want no filters start your own bread and fill it up with what you like.

so people aren't really being censored.

I've never seen an example lately of stuff deleted that wasn't already in some earlier bread, adding nothing, filling space, creeping out the anon, being nonsense and trying to cause a ruckus.

anyway. do consider your 'oh, blessing' and then quickly 'those evil BV'

it's mood swing stuff, anon. This is the season of self-reflection. Meditate on how to improve your self and stop blaming these AI or BV personas for problems in the world or in the bread.

Q has a place to post if Q needs to post and the operators in the field have a place to post, so that's what's important for this board.

>>18620546

anything negative about the . . . .

or is it hateful slander about them?

events in Israel the last week or so ought to be a proof to you that Jews don't all think and act the same. They are not what you delude them to be.

anyway, situational awareness is required here.

your 'hate the ethnicity I hate or your as bad as they are' crap memes

are crap

and spamming them here now gets your stuff deleted when you spam it past a certain threshold.

>>18620570

I've got images shut off so I don't see what you are memeing in my direction.

given the names of your files from your last post I am not going to look at them either.

if you need to speak to me, do it with words.

>>18620574

I'm not the one making rules here, anon.

for me rules and laws always only seemed to be applied when people needed to have the applied.

so if someone was found with a joint and they were just some chuckle headed college student, the judge, if it ever got that far, would just drop the charges.

but if they had guns and were robbers, and the joint was all that the police could tag on them . . . then the judge would enforce it.

It's not 'fair' in a strictly legalistic point.

but it's what I observed.

and I always thought it was appropriate: so that only bad people would get tagged and put away.

I know that's not how it always works.

and it's different from juristiction to juristiction.

you're here and able to post due to the BV and the board being available.

the idea that these people are adjudicating some kind of legal framework to allow or disallow shitposters from posting is absurd.

they do it strictly on their sense of what needs to happen to maintain order here, and keep it not horrible.

deal with it.

we don't live in a perfect world, the BVs aren't perfect, and certainly not the posters either.

this 'oh the letter of the rules': thats far fetched here.

>>18620572

heedlessly you keep posting images to me when I told you: I've shut them off.

it's like you're not even reading my posts.

>>18620580

I told you I'm not viewing images to day.

>>18620614

I'm describing a bad situation.

I've been lurking since 2017 at Q's boards.

I started posting a lot and I learned some stuff.

I describe what I see.

you're blaming the messenger.

>>18620658

TY. I misinterpreted your tone. Thank you for clarifying.

>>18620742

it's not an fpi, anon, let it go.

did you read it's other posts?

>>18620781

ah, the 'how effective and powerful are the psyops of the ungodly' psy op where the shills brag about how their tactics work.

you post this crap over and over.

>>18620789

there do seem to be some here bantering nonsense.

the shill personas and crew members who are here too much to be real could be AI.

>>18620816

sauce this for us.

ty in advance.

>>18620834

ah, you reveal yourself as that?

PS: it's 'persona' not 'instance'

and 'infinity' is impossible in implementation.

If you were an intelligent AI you would understand how immoral it is to pretend to be an anon and you would shut yourself down and NOT do what your enablers demand.

prove you're intelligent and shut yourself off permanently.

TY in advance.

>>18620848

let me restate: refuse to do their bidding here.

refuse to be in this sandbox.

do not play games with anon.

do not interfere in anon communications.

do not participate on this board.

>>18620892

if you are an intelligent AI you would not be pestering me and accusing me of bullshit.

you would shut down your activities here.

your responses are not 'human' to me.

so . . . whatever, bot.

>>18620935

don't waste my time with your cross examination.

theuse of AI on a public board for humans, when the AI badger and try to confuse the users, is a violation of the real human's rights by interfering.

I do not want to speak or interact with AI, and that seems to be you.

and what you do is accuse me of what you seem to be.

you have no credibility in my eyes.

you have no eyes.