>>1862278

Just FYI…

>>1862559

>>1862699

"Anything wrong?"

Yes, the date is misleading on the Hypebeast article on Amancio Ortega. Do a browser search on this thread and you'll see an earlier article… one that is dated THREE DAYS BEFORE the EO.

>>1862753

Link is >>1862559 for dates of Zara CEO Ortega resignation

>>1862779

>Zara founder retires, Dec 17

>>1862779

Sorry, let me clarify:

The text says "Dec 17," but the screenshot it's pointing to says "Anyone spotted the date?" and that date says "Dec 21."

My point: According to 2 screenshots posted earlier on this bread, the EO was Dec 21 and the FashionUnited article date was Dec 18.

Either Ortega is innocent and knew nothing about the upcoming EO, or he knew it was coming.

The multiple dates are confusing, that's all.

>>1862850

Thanks. Details matter on this because it could be a red flag that points to a sealed indictment he knew about.

WWG1WGA