But how has it been debunked? >>18625562
>gets wild around here when that is discussed.
>Don't let it get you down.
>Anons should be encouraging more research.
did ya READ the 'Globals' at top of every bread, a link for RRN???
hover n read it { including the Date n TStamp }:
>>17980519 No RRN in notes
discuss ok, but not going in Notables as per BO, BV, and many many anons
da$~$ting thost here:
>will rejoice when they find out most of the evil fucks are already dead. MSM will never recover.