>>18627254 (pb)

>>18627342

>but the reality is corporations and the government is doing shit that we never consented to

And let me add, this tactic is used everywhere.

It's fear based mind control.

LET US SHOOT YOUR NEWBORN WITH VITAMIN K, OTHERWISE IT WILL DIE.

Fear porn, based on nothing but lies.

And the 3 Vitamin K shots, that are given in a very short time contain 33 times the recommended daily dosage of Vitamin K for an adult female, or around 1000 times the recommended daily dosage of Vitamin K for a newborn. If you think that's good for your health, I got news for you.

Same shit with vaccines.

IF YOU DONT ALLOW US TO INJECT THIS INTO YOUR CHILD, YOUR CHILD WILL GET POLIO AND WILL BE PARALYZED

>oh no, I will do what you say, big authority in a white coat. I just want my child to live.

DON'T DRINK RAW MILK, IT'S DEADLY!! DRINK PASTEURIZED MILK, THAT ONE IS HEALTHY. WE NEED TO KILL ALL THESE EVIL GERMS.

That's a lie as well. Pasteurized milk is dead rotten milk and bad for your health.

And fun fact raw milk lasts ages, literally, unless contaminated. Pasteurized milk doesn't.

So once again the satanic system tells you the opposite of the truth.

And why would the satanic system even warn you regarding "corona"? They would just tell you it's the flu and kill you that way.

Unless it's actually the flu, and they just want you to be in fear and follow orders blindly. Like wearing stupid masks.

>>18627370

>should be a Dr

I don't follow orders blindly and I question everything though.

So no, I would get kicked out of quack school.

Case in point: go to your favorite doctor (let's say you are one), and ask about MRC-5, WI-38, HEK-293.

>He will say he has no idea.

And then ask if these vaccines are totally safe.

>He will say very safe.

And then ask how stupid he thought that Trump suggestion was to inject disinfectant.

>He will say orange man bad and stupid and injecting disinfectant very dangerous to health.

>>18627254 (pb)

>>18627384

And one more fear porn that comes to my mind.

C-sections.

NAH, THAT'S TOTALLY FINE, JUST LET US CUT YOU OPEN AND GET THE BABY OUT, THIS IS NOT DANGEROUS OR BAD FOR YOUR BABBY'S HEALTH.

Meanwhile in actual reality:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662709/

Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean Section—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Cesarean section is a surgical procedure, which is the most frequently performed in gynecology and obstetrics. It is commonly believed that an operative delivery is a less painful and safer mode of delivery, which translates into an increasing number of the procedures performed without medical indications. The maternal sequelae of cesarean sections are well elucidated and widely discussed in the literature,while long-term neonatal consequences still remain the issue of research and scientific dispute.

…

Results: Conducted meta-analyses revealed thatcaesarean section is a risk factor for respiratory tract infections (pooled OR = 1.30 95%CI 1.06–1.60, p = 0.001), asthma (pooled OR = 1.23 95%CI 1.14–1.33, p < 0.00001) as well as obesity (pooled OR = 1.35 95%CI 1.29–1.41, p < 0.00001) in offspring.Conclusions: The results of the studies included indicated that children delivered by cesarean section more commonly developed respiratory tract infections, obesity and the manifestations of asthma than children delivered vaginally. The risk of developing diabetes mellitus type 1 or neurological disorders in offspring after caesarean section is still under discussion.

Wow, Asthma up?

Customers FOR LIVE.

Let's give the quacks that do that more money for c-sections and push them hard. More c-sections, yes.

And this meta study is from 2020. You would think the quacks would turn it down, but no. They love money. Fuck the babies.

It's also known that the gut flora of children that were born through this cut-open method and children that were born naturally is DIFFERENT. But no one gives a fuck.

>>18627454

>and typical board talking points

What's a "typical board talking point"?

>I just had the flu

All evidence points to that, sorry.

The flu knocks you out.

The common cold doesn't.

You may simply have gotten the common cold before, and you are used to that. And now you got the flu once, and are impressed by it.

>But I Definitely just had a type of flu thatcould nothave been manufactured.

Tell me what "the flu" even is.

Is it infectious?

Is it "a virus"?

>It is hard to say they might spread poison and not say covidmighthave been manufactured. both can be true

If "corona" was something new, it would be on top of the flu, but that did not happen and that's a fact.

It would also be on top of "regular pneumonia", but that also didn't happen.

Instead flu went down, regular pneumonia went down. That makes zero sense when I apply your fake news fear porn to it.

Again: why would they do that, when they want to push you to the vaccines?

And if "the flu" is simply poison, or is simply a detox, then it would be caused by poison and your body would simply want to get rid of the poison. The flu would be a symptom,and not a dis-ease.

>>18627567

You are insulting me over and over.

I didn't insult you a single time.

Anons do not insult another.

>People get sick every year , multiple symptoms, varying degrees of severity. What causes that? Virus? Bug? All in their head?

As I already said, the flu may be simply a detox.

The US military tried to infect another with "the flu" and failed. Not just once, but it didn't work at all.

>You have nothing, you are a parrot

BS, I did my own research.

You are lying.

>brainless shill

I don't like to get insulted by "anons".

>repeating garbage

Have you read Edward Jenner's work regarding vaccines?

I doubt you did. I did.

It's eye opening. That's the start of vaccines.

You see, when I say all the evidence points to covid being the flu, I'm not saying that must be it, but that it's highly likely that it's renamed.

You don't explain any of the inconsistencies, you simply say "I feel like I had corona and it surely wasn't the flu, because I lost my sense of taste", and that's it. That's an emotional argument.

And now you even call logical reasoning on my end "garbage".

I can't take you seriously.