Anonymous ID: 12bd1f April 5, 2023, 9 a.m. No.18645628   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5642 >>5658 >>5761

>>18645610

So be Christian and get +, be Luciferian and get ++?

Because working for Lucifer is indirectly working for God. The rewards seems a bit backwards, wouldn't the one in direct service be better compensated than those working though proxy?

>>18645618

No, but the question was economic stability - and even if they aren't doing well right now they have been and still are way more economically stable than most Christians.

Anonymous ID: 12bd1f April 5, 2023, 9:05 a.m. No.18645655   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5680

>>18645642

>Transactional relationships with deities is kinda, eww.

Isn't that what all interactions with deities are? In the case of Christianity it the transaction of being saved in return for worship and devotion.

But what do I know - I think deities are metaphors and systems of control so I rarely interact with them, and when I do it's not in the spiritual or religious sense.

Anonymous ID: 12bd1f April 5, 2023, 9:11 a.m. No.18645681   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18645658

>If Christians are economically unstable

I'm not saying they are, I was comparing them to the 1%.

> Evil is broke.

Everyone is broke, they are collapsing the money system.