>>18649666 (pb)
if you can't take a skeptics point of view about an over rated rainy August 'festival' 54 years later, I'm sorry to pop your bubble.
seriously, the 'hippy' thing was over rated.
and the woodstock generation was a psyop.
if you read as many interviews about Pop and Rock as I did over the years, you'd understand my skepticism.
I gave you some stock points about why Woodstock sucked, and you acted upset like I was criticizing you.
why do you put so much of your identity into an event that was over hyped and promoted to death to the point of it being a mocking of the people it was supposed to be 'elevating'
don't you find it curious that it was promoted to that extreme?
you should open your mind a bit.
like the music you like, anon. But hanging your identity on the crappy lyrics of drug addicted fame-mongers from 54 years ago . . . seems like something you need to acess and ask yourself: who would I have been if I didn't fall for all that?