Anonymous ID: 55a3e5 April 6, 2023, 7:15 a.m. No.18651080   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18651065

 

I asked this question a while back and if he is editing for content he is acting as a publisher potentially. Its presumptive editing as to word usage. There is some debate about the disclaimer under each post which makes it appear to be more of a platform since individual users responsible blah blah. Just a curious development.

Anonymous ID: 55a3e5 April 6, 2023, 7:27 a.m. No.18651139   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1177

>>18651122

its part of the abuse and gaslighting also to set others up so that they will not speak out as if anyone would believe them anyways. Hell most people are not willing to believe that the ashley biden diary is real. Anons know but even with that as proof there is still the ability to dismiss those who have been traumatized. People truly do know understand how wide this problem is and how bad things really are. This is why the sanctimony of many christians in this battle turns many off to figuring out and finding the truth in christ as the groups available are mostly all compromised as well.

Anonymous ID: 55a3e5 April 6, 2023, 7:47 a.m. No.18651287   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18651251

I am not sure why that word itself was banned I can potentially see the k word, but it is strange, perhaps he is being pressured some how, cut down on word usage, hell I go after shills a little hard sometimes, so I get it but perhaps between the 4chan arrest and the shit against matt gaetz perhaps it is cutting down on potential incidents. Would not mind a list however to save time. I do wonder how when sites do things like this how it changes the platform vs publisher debate? Editing is an act of a publisher.