>>18676353 PB
So working on the idea that The Plan we are trusting actually turns out to be the same Plan promoted by the Lucis Trust (at lucistrust.com) this is looking very much like a fight between the luciferians and the satanists, correct? And if the Lucis Trust Plan is the foundation of The Plan, isn't it a concern that the Lucis Trust are so proudly entangled with the United Nations?
This needs to be clarified.
Zippy
This is my current topic.
A explanation I found fascinating of the Rosecrucian understanding of three types of spiritual entities, implying that the battle is not just a duality between the luciferic light and the ahrimanic darkness. The light of the Christ and Jesus is a third, middle way.
Presently Q is looking very luciferic - ie: full of light and truth but lacking the Christ component.
Is the Lucis trust really responsible for Q? Can we really hope that the light of Lucifer will bring a solution to the world narrative?
It is my sense that a clarification of which particular Light we are heading to out of this Darkness will be essential to reinvigorate the movement. Half measures avail us nothing.
So, Q's 'The Plan' and Lucis Trust's "The Plan" are different?
It's Michael Flynn's Elizabeth-Clare-Prophet prayer that makes me wonder if they are the very same thing.
This is why I am posting this.
Perhaps it is correct that Christ is actually a third way.
It is worth Q crew considering.