Anonymous ID: 8f9cb6 April 12, 2023, 5:51 a.m. No.18682575   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18682556

>turns into a slide

You say that like it's a bad thing.

And, to your credit it was a bad thing years ago.

But, now the slides save QR from being a .17 ppm cricketboard.

Long live the slides! (halfway decent ones anyway)

Anonymous ID: 8f9cb6 April 12, 2023, 6 a.m. No.18682609   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18682590

>Only intel agencies

QR might have an even higher % of NEET posters than half does.

Certainly has a higher number of retired anons and even some disability gibsmedats, too.

But, yeah, whatever their origins Omnishifters are really strange creatures especially those still doing it in 2023.

Anonymous ID: 8f9cb6 April 12, 2023, 6:40 a.m. No.18682774   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2780 >>2811 >>2827

>>18682717

So, you obviously don't know a damn thing about Tripcodes.

>not so QRD

There's a black box that if you give it a string it's algorithm will spit out a different string.

A pwd only you know is what you give it - and a unique string known as the Tripcode gets spit out.

As long as nobody finds out/guesses your pwd only you will be able to get the unique TC to be created.

Change the black box algo (happened right before the 1st "Q" drop in 2022) and that same pwd will no longer produce that same TC.

The only thing that could would be a totally diff pwd - good luck trying all those combos out.

Now change the black box algo back to what it was (also happened before the next series of "Q" posts in 2022) and the old TC can go back to being produced by the old pwd.

>Bottom Line

Whether via God/KEK/Real Q Team/Otherโ€ฆ.

Without that SALT Rotation (black box algo change) taking place nobody would have been any wiser about the proven fact that Q's old TC could not have been generated by his pwd at that point in time.

That TC was hardcoded.