>>18688487 (pb)

>>18688365 (pb)

NM ZIP CODES DUMP

FYI - I took one county and checked that the dump was accurate for ACTBLUE / not employeds. ANON did me good.

BUT NOTE:

> 115 unemployed donated $1,922.49 [72.39%]

The 115 number isn't the number of individual people. It's the number of times their contribution(s) was divied up. I didn't check this particular county yet, but based on the one I'm working on, donations split 115 times might have only come from 1-10 individual people.

Also, noted: At least one of these names is on my suspicious absentee ballot actvity list. It is a name that keeps popping up each election. With other suspicious activity being noted in the registration file (unusual changes). This one donated just under $270, split up between 63 donations. Over 2 year period. OK, not an extraordinary amount of money. It's just odd the way it gets split up and called "earmarked".

Just spot checked a few that stand out visually…….. the split up of the money goes out in about 90-300 different little donations. From less than .50 cents up to around $10 to: "Earmarked". or to "ActBlue"

This is a really low pop/ poor county. $500 to $1500, split up between many. One employed person donating $1500 is an exception around here, except for certain professions. But unemployed?

A lot of drug money here though. Those in the know, tell me without the drug money here the entire economy would collapse. ActBlue wouldn't be cash donation. Cash can purchase a pre-paid debit card……….

I'm wondering if they have some kind of algorithm to make sure these donations that are split into many little pieces don't stand out too much in smaller counties (in terms of total dollars donated).

Head spinning off to a meeting.