Anonymous ID: 59011f April 14, 2023, 5:08 p.m. No.18696475   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18696460

Imagine having an Employee

you pay him $500/Hr

That employee is an ass and is causing a lot of issues

 

You could… Fire him & hire a new guy fresh off the streets for $15/hr

 

Save a Fortune, Save the headaches

Anonymous ID: 59011f April 14, 2023, 6:58 p.m. No.18697064   🗄️.is 🔗kun

War Treason

(SPIES)

348 See GREENSPAN, MODERN LAW OF LAND WARFARE 330 (“The characteristic which unites all acts of war treason

is that they are hostile acts committed inside the area controlled by the belligerent against whom the acts are directed

by persons who do not possess the status of combatants.”); LAUTERPACHT, II OPPENHEIM’S INTERNATIONAL LAW

575 (§255) (“So-called ‘war treason’ consists of all such acts (except hostilities in arms on the part of the civilian

population, spreading of seditious propaganda by aircraft, and espionage) committed within the lines of a belligerent

as are harmful to him and are intended to favour the enemy.”)

Spying and sabotage are not prohibited by any law of war treaty to which the United

States is a Party. For example, spying and sabotage are not prohibited by the 1949 Geneva

Conventions, nor defined as a “grave breach” of those conventions.355 Similarly, spying and

sabotage also have not been listed as war crimes punishable under the statutes of international

criminal tribunals.356 In addition, law of war treaties that regulate, but do not prohibit, spying,

recognize implicitly that belligerents may use this method of warfare.

357

Although spying and sabotage are not prohibited by the law of war, acting clandestinely

or under false pretenses could, in some circumstances, constitute “feigning a protected status,”

one of the elements of perfidy.358 Persons engaged in these activities and commanders who

employ them should take special care not to kill or wound by resort to perfidy.

4.17.5 Spying and Sabotage – Forfeiture of the Privileges of Combatant Status. Although

the law of war allows belligerents to employ spies, saboteurs, and other persons engaged in

secretive hostile activities behind enemy lines, the law of war also permits belligerents to take

additional measures to defend against these persons.

These individuals, by acting clandestinely or under false pretenses, fail to distinguish

themselves as combatants generally must do.359 Thus, persons otherwise entitled to privileges of

combatant status, including POW status, forfeit their entitlement to those privileges while

engaged in spying, sabotage, or other hostile, secretive activities behind enemy lines.

360

Although not explicitly reflected in the GPW, this understanding was the general understanding

at the 1949 Diplomatic Conference361 and is reflected in other treaties,362 judicial decisions,

363

However, outside the context of patriotic acts of resistance by persons in international

armed conflict, private acts of hostility often carry additional sanction under international law.

For example, persons who set off in private military expeditions against a foreign State from a

State that has peaceful relations with the foreign State, have been subject to punishment under

the law of nations.395 Similarly, private acts of hostility, under certain conditions, may be

regarded as piracy.396 In contemporary parlance, private acts of hostility are often punished as

“terrorism.”397 The unauthorized use of violence by private persons to achieve political ends has

been viewed as contrary to the principles of democratic States.398 Moreover, States have

obligations under international law to repress terrorism, especially when conducted on their

territory against other States.399

 

https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1023075.pdf

 

I Think it Says we can't hang em