Fuck, someone laced their acid with strychnine…
Well that's dasting. And today we call these garments worn by WITCHES…
"Witch Hunt", anyone?
While on the topic of Musks Twitter/Government censorship collusion, I thought I'd dig into what the AUS Government is involved in and what means they've adopted to censor Australians.
I found this company http://digi.org.au is purposed with that task. A NON GOVERNMENT ORG, set in place as our own MINISTRY OF TRUTH.
What I'm trying to find is how individual MP's/Senators, GOV officials access social media portals directly to ban individual users or alt media articles/authors.
“In this code, we’ve worked to get the balance right with what we think people expect when communicating over the internet,” Digi’s managing director, Sunita Bose, said in a statement. “Companies are committing to robust safeguards against harmful misinformation and disinformation that also protect privacy, freedom of expression and political communication.”
https://digi.org.au/in-the-media/australian-government-ready-to-pursue-facebook-and-twitter-if-misinformation-code-doesnt-work/
https://youtu.be/RvwuEC8e_Ig
So it's likely that our politicians don't comm directly with social media companies, they have DIGI act as the middle man, which gives pollies plausible deniability. But that means they must be in comms with DIGI. This means that any FOI requests would need to include comms between pollies and DIGI
Interdasting… Digging deeper, we find further connections, so it's like one org comms with another org. … IIC © 2019 | The International Institute of Communications
Of interest is the term, "INTERMEDIA CONTENT" which we see when a coordinated media attack occurs attempting to debunk an issue or brainwash the public there's nothing to see here, move along… It would appear these people coordinate on what is and when to call "conspiracy theory"…?
The IIC exists to enable the balanced, open dialogue that shapes the policy agenda
The IIC’s events, meetings and articles coalesce around five global themes addressing trends in innovation and investment, content, competition, privacy and spectrum. These themes are reflected in the event programmes and in Intermedia content.
It appears so far, that DIGI relies on an international panel of corporate directors as advisors on policy. So, while on the surface it appears that AUS has its own ministry of truth, in fact DIGI is simply a conduit which outsources its policy directly from corporations. In effect it's possible and likely the AUS government has no sovereignty over these censorship policies at all. Which is probably why when ministers are questioned on these topics, all they can manage is a sheepish look and some corporate jargon about for the greater good.
Scratching the surface, the appearance is that unelected bureaucrats are driving policy, while ignorant/criminal ministers simply rubber stamp it into legislation. In effect, government acts as if they're the drivers of policy, while big tech are actually in charge of what policy government will put forward. It's the same playbook as big pharma financing FDA/TGA product approval.
This woman is linked with both DIGI in AUS and the IIC, International Institute of Communications. https://www.iicom.org/profile/jennifer-duxbury-dr/
And the people in the IIC are linked to firms such as Asia Pacific Content Google; Director, Vice President the Disney Company, among others.
https://www.iicom.org/people/
Vanguard was the original name of the English Navy Gallion, built by Vanguard. Being a Merchant Navy, each ship was it's own corporation. The logo of Vanguard reflects it's history to it's original incorporation. Model replica of original 78 gunship Vanguard.