>>18699591
proved by insta shill
What was the change in the Lord's Prayer declared by the Poop?
>>18699554
look how old that "news" is ?
'05 ? is that almost 20 years ago?
and the book that covers all that in detail lagged behind the public knowledge anyway.
Mr. S. Hicks did a good job on this book. about the best you can do, well sourced, for an approach to the 9/11 false-flag that is pretty weak, but basically credible in its own right?
Nothing is ever done , no consequenses for these type of lapst.
Or for the fact it was overt,
The attack was completely organized and carried out by our alleged government.
It 's not a few rogue people.
These hang-outs are also a part of their scheme? To take pressure off, to make people feel there' progress in the case, and they know something… was off and now they know a little more.
Another piece of work along those lines, of Intel failure (Though Sanders showed the FBI actually handled and coached the patsies, more than just "ignore warnings")
The "ignore warnings" excuse was used right away 'gainst W. Bush - and very plausibly because he appeared to be a dullard. When he appeared in front of the 9/11 Commission which he, himself, had appointed, he wasn't allowed to say a word. Cheney did all the talking.
The original claim "ignored the memo" was against "fortunate son" "W."
who we now find out is in a lineage of paper-clip Nazi - if you want to get right up to date with revelations; and move away from "we can now release info that is 20 years old, again"
END THE ENDLESS
The other work along the lines of "the Big Wedding" if you have time on your hands to study, or just want to collect it is
"Who Killed John O'Neill"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HV2eFH58QGjp/