>>1871247

the vatican loan is much more significant than most believe.

5% interest per annum magic.

Magic, as one said, is in the INTEREST.

There is no interests that can be created.

Money magic.

If you borrow ten dollars and pay back two, there is no 'other' place on earth where that two can come from.

thus, they own everything eventually - and debt is just future mark of their 'ownership'

current USD value of global easy access money supply is 90 trillion+

Debt/derivative market is over 300 trillion.

Picture getting clearer?

>>1871276

You might want to recheck history, BV. Also, recheck your 'opinions'.

There is a very specific reason why this angle is not being let go.

Or why that specific faggot is being singled out.

This is not a game.

Use logic, not emotion.>>1871276

>>1871314

Of course, for some reason, BV is letting this obvious JIDF slide….

might want to recalibrate here boys/girls.

>>1871323

A BV needs to recheck his priorities - and unlike you, we ain't hiding lol

>>1871334

Do the math with 5% from 1832.

Figure is significant - along with the current 'balance'.

Now consider vatican bank held a great deal of influence and financial pull in the 18th century.

The entire earth's asset is not a stretch.

Greatest intelligence organ before modern state agency was?