>>18709735
Democrats attacking Trump might want to rethink a few things. The biggest thing is that Trump largely left the vaccine narrative alone, though he did, anon thinks, speak against mandates.
If Democrats continue to persecute Trump, the likelihood of the whole CDC (quasi-military) civilian bioweapons program known as the various "vaccine schedules" getting fully outed goes astronomically upwards. IF the Democrats crawl under their respective rocks and dial back on ALL vaccine "requirements" they will do much to alleviate further harm and avoid the peril of a sudden mass population awakening on vaccines.
Democrats, which seem to be the "anti-life" party have shown ZERO compunction about allowing women to have their babies carved up in utero and the parts sold off. They also seem to have ZERO compunction about any sort of vote rigging and/or cheating known to man or demon. Why would they, the party of "vaccine mandates" hesitate to use an injection to alter the "body politic"?
In anon's very conservative and Christian circle the number of children with "developmental disabilities" and bizarre health conditions is higher even than the "normal". Anon has seen one report of a health care worker who thought it might be a good idea to lie to a conservative woman about the health of her baby in order to encourage the woman to abort the child. Could the vaccine program have means of directing toxic batches to people the DS doesn't like? Does attacking the people's President affect the eventual unwinding of the vaccine pogrom?
Anon would like to reiterate that the Democrats might want to rethink attacking Trump. He is good for America not just the godly segment of the population.