>>18720730

one post chiming in during a heated discussion is not proof of someone who is IP hopping, but one wonders why this type of post always defend people who are obviously compromised.

it's not a question of 'providing proof' because the IP hoppers don't provide it except occasionally they make a mistaken post.

it's pretty rare.

no way to prove mulitple devices but they one-post badgers, like this one, always defend the compromised or known to be compromised and always devolve in the same way through various bullet points of a script.

one post at a time.

Meanwhile the compromised people keep up their gas lighting and nonsense.

everyone knows the board is compromised.

why we argue with these people? just to give them grief?

or to warn the world: this is not a free speech venue, despite what the disclosures say.

and if you say 'provide proof that it is.' to them, well, that's just the same as what they say.

so no one can prove it except to themselves.

BV's are just random people given too much authority and behave as tyrants and dungeon keepers.

and notice how the defenders of those who are compromised always devolve into name calling and other methods of intimidation.

every time.

the pattern repeats so often that it's almost a statistical proof of the board being compromised and the baker teams being enemies of the board and the anon, and Q and Maga.

prove me wrong?

you can't.

and there it is, the defeated, who are obviously shills for people who hate the MAGA, start in with the gore.

they know that no one buys the gaslighting, so they do the gore so they can start deleting anyone else they want to delete as well.

>>18721078

my describing the obvious is met with hatred and death threats.

I describe what it is.

why is that a threat?

if you all know it's compromised, then why get so defensive about it?

obviously I'm a long term lurker and an anon who probably posts more than I should but

you make up stuff 'how to navigate the board'?

I describe what happens, and the shill teams blow their lids, slander, death threats, constant badgering, intimidation tactics, telling me what they think I think about the board, telling me 'tough what are you going to do about it', or the best one (from last night) 'that is why we give you your own board' as if It's only me and no one else.

how could that be?

in any case, here you are, gas lighting with the standards 'you're not good enough to even be here,'

which is a corollary of the 'you too stupid' and the 'nothing you ever do is good enough'.

what's next, telling me what you want to do with a relative of mine? that usually happens if I persist and keep up letting them work down their list of tactics.

>>18720674

and yet they let the board be run and dominated by a psychopathic poster who posts cartoon children, pretends to be a person from years ago, who seems to be IP hopping, and demands constant attention. It's not organic that they let that shill go on, and the death threats that accompany when anyone challenges it, But they are upset about someone posting nonsense about channeling.

>>18721125

and this is an example of how they devolve into name calling, even when the other poster has a valid point.

the BV earlier kept saying 'provide proof', so that's why I decided to chime in today.

all that they do is always monitored, but how often does anyone point out 'ah, here we go again'

personally I think channelling is dangerous spiritualism, and makes people crazy.

but the board has rules and those rules are not followed when the personal grudges of BV's allow for posters to be deleted.

and then after the person's post is deleted there is a dominance ritual of posts to the person when they ask 'why'.

you get the old standards like 'see tthe' and 'whacha gonna do' or 'deal with it'

and also it gets worse, too.

they will say what they want to do to your family while you are forced to watch, stuff like that.

that's the new normal? enduring threats and intimidation for expressing an opinion that censorship is wrong?

>>18721156

>>18721158

here we go: two more examples

the first says 'why don't you bake'

because I observe and I find your team to be immoral and I wouldn't want to assocaite myself with you that closely.

the second post more of the 'you are stupid'. but it's a the 'you behave as a child'

hey from the mouths of babes, anon.

and of course we have a gore storm going on at the same time.

so all of this is an example of how the board is now a compromised limited hangout, gate keepered by some team, who? we don't know.

is it the US gove? probably not.

probably an overseas team.

are they funded with US gov dollars?

again, who knows.

will they ever relent?

when the money runs out.

>>18721173

don't be so sure.

it's not always that they are let to go on with it.

it must become too obvious, and there is someone who prevents them from just deleting everything.

remember: the BVs are not all the same, and there are many different ones.

but they do seem to cover up for the mistakes and violations of the nasty ones.

BV is the equivalent of 'mall cop'

>>18721187

how would anyone take my work seriously in years to come, as an observer, if I went the anjel G root and started baking?

isn't it good to have an outside observer who keeps a tally of what goes on here?

Of course it is.

>>18721187

PS: no, the teams of shill bakers are immoral.

the way they behave.

the board performs as designed with the enemies doing all the hard work, as chumps.

>>18721201

where's my memes?

I only post them occasionally now, since Jan 6.

sorry.

>>18721212

my posts were deleted one day recently for no reason, anon.

and as far as you saying soemone else is dead weight, once again, you're on attack mode.

because I observe and post what I see.

and you don't want people getting a concise read that tells them about the tactics that some of the bakers use here.

when, as you said earlier (was it you) everyone knows the score now and deal with it?

was that you who said that?

>>18721237

clearly there are some bakers BV combos that tag team those who displease them.

there is a lot of spurious deletion going on.

and usually that is followed by the ones who do it bragging that there isn't anything anyone can do about it. Or 'I'm here to stay'.