>>18728406
>45 working
Yeah and 45 also working on arresting Hillary Clinton. That's not an answer.
Electronics are by definition not trustworthy.
>e.g. Intel just closed
What's that supposed to mean?
Can a regular human create his own CPUs?
The answer is no. He has to buy them from some garbage corporation, which means none are trustworthy at all.
>New serverless internet incoming
Why should I trust that internet?
>no rights
So it's nothing.
>theirs, not ours. see above.
Exactly.
But for shitcoin you need their internet.
>small fusion, infrastructure yes, but I'm not black-pilled
So wait a moment, when you rely on govern MENTE to keep on providing you with internet and electricity, what is shitcoin supposed to solve?
You are making yourself more reliant on GOVERN MENTE, instead of doing the opposite.
Even fiat cash is better, because at least it's kind of anonymous.
Their internet isn't.
>sell them now before it's too late. get educated on crypto or find another way to survive
You sell shitcoin now?
What?
>it's not the only solution
Shitcoin is no solution AT ALL.
[x] reliant on their internet
[x] reliant on electronics
[x] reliant on electricity
[x] reliant on access to their internet (easily cut by introducing digital id being mandatory for access, which alos means they can ban you)
[x] pay for every transaction, way worse than fiat cash
[x] no rollback
[x] YOU are responsible for everything, despite not being able to make anything secure
Meanwhile someone with gold or silver coins at least don't rely on resources, doesn't pay per transaction, is anonymous, and can actually protect what he owns.