>>18728101 (pb)

this is how the shill scumbags work

even though I made it clear that I do not think that the two who were tag teaming me were actual anons, but shills, and they were doing the 'division throuhg promoting racism' this one pretends, still, as if he/she/it is an anon as if it's me who'se saying that anon are racist.

my point: anons aren't about racism, but the tag teaming shills are tasked to make it seem as though anons are.

and the gaslighting of that type always stays on their hateful message.

there is no convincing them to stop.

they are paid to do it, and they are relentless.

the only way to get them to stop is to cut off their funding.

>>18728881

this is a bait post.

the reason : that type of horrid person can be anywhere.

Isolated places outside of the eye of others, and remote, with few people, are prime locations for the abomination behaviors of bad people.

why would you think otherwise?

>>18728906

are you willing to pay for the health damage caused by the electronics that those devices cause?

why stop with police? why not make politicians wear them too?

and why just one, why not have it be a 360 degree view?

in fact the money to pay for the infrastructure for all that electronics might be better spent helping the communities.

instead you want tech and silicon valley to turn every town hall into a high RF zone of expensive 1984 style surveillance.

why aren't you wearing one of those cameras too?

who pays for all that?

do you own stock in a surveillance company.

where will all the money for all of that overhead of infrastructure come from?

>>18728907

'easier to weed out'

weeding out evil is a process of mind.

people aren't evil, they become willing to quickly do evil.

so maybe you should start with that thought that you'd have that ability.

go look in a mirror, and what do you see?

I classify your response as yet more bait.

>>18728930

do you or do you not profit from forcing service members and those who serve as officers of the law wear all that equipment.

you're changing the subject.

if a community has a lot of poor people in it the money for body cameras is better spent on other stuff.

the costs are enormous.

your method of changing the subject is noted.

what else are you going to make up?

imagine how much money would be needed to force body cameras on all public employees?

so: disclose: do you profit off of this or not?

>>18728911

John John was in Worcester?

huh.

how many John F. Kennedy Jr's are there in the world? probably a lot.

>>18728942

ah, someone butting in or someone IP hopping.

I'm not playing your games, OK.

go badger someone else.

>>18728946

if the police office wants to do that, fine.

the other said it has to be a requirement or they'd be fired.

why stop with police? why not make children outside after dark wear body cameras too?

you're done, great.

I think you're yet another badger troll, just trying to cause conflict.

>>18728964

>bd20a2

a child has no power?

tell that to the people who have their windows smashed, or liquid thrown in their faces when the herds of teenager rampage through a downtown.

PS: the children who go wild are often highly funded, their parents get money for them. the schools get money for them. the town gets grant money.

the towns and schools get to spend that money even if it doesn't help the children at all.

the huge infrastructure used to collect and store all that video is money that is laundered into the pockets of people who sell the equipment.

>>18728977

still none of the three of you tag teaming me have revealed: do yo profit off the infrastructure necessary to put cameras on all police?

yes or no.

saying 'bait' is bait.

>>18728991

you still haven't said if you profit from the cameras or not.

you are making up stuff that I didn't say.

schools and towns get money for each child from the states and from the federal government.

>>18728996

the 'you're not smart enough to decode all my gaslighting' defense.

>>18729006

more gaslighting.

>>18729036

>>18729027

you guys are so obvious

one of you makes children all out to be holy angels

the other one is just spitballing whatever he can to jam up the conversation.

using cope makes you glow.

making children into spotless angels also makes you glow.

goodbye tag team