'Special' service: Declassified Guantanamo court filing suggests some 9/11 hijackers were CIA agents
What does the intelligence agency have to do with the suicide terrorist attack?
An explosive court filing from the Guantanamo Military Commission – a court considering the cases of defendants accused of carrying out the "9/11" terrorist attacks on New York – has seemingly confirmed the unthinkable.
The document was originally published via a Guantanamo Bay court docket, but while public, it was completely redacted. Independent researchers obtained an unexpurgated copy. It is an account by the Commission’s lead investigator, DEA veteran Don Canestraro, of his personal probe of potential Saudi government involvement in the 9/11 attacks, conducted at the request of the defendants’ lawyers.
Two of the hijackers were being closely monitored by the CIA and may, wittingly or not, have been recruited by Langley long before they flew planes into the World Trade Center buildings.
This iconic Kiev monastery survived the Mongols, the Nazis, and the Bolsheviks – can it withstand Zelensky?
Read more This iconic Kiev monastery survived the Mongols, the Nazis, and the Bolsheviks – can it withstand Zelensky?
The story of two men
Of the great many enduring mysteries of the 9/11 attacks still unresolved over two decades later, perhaps the biggest and gravest relate to the activities of Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar in the 18 months leading up to that fateful day. The pair traveled to the US on multi-entry visas in January 2000, despite having repeatedly been flagged by the CIA and NSA previously as likely Al Qaeda terrorists.
Mere days before their arrival, they attended an Al Qaeda summit in Kuala Lumpur, during which key details of the 9/11 attacks are likely to have been discussed and agreed. The meeting was secretly photographed and videotaped by Malaysian authorities at the direct request of the CIA’s Alec Station, a special unit set up to track Osama bin Laden, although oddly, no audio was captured.
Still, this background should’ve been sufficient to prevent Hazmi and Midhar from entering the US – or at least enough for the FBI to be informed of their presence in the country. As it was, they were admitted for a six-month period at Los Angeles International airport without incident, and Bureau representatives within Alec Station were blocked from sharing this information with their superiors by the CIA.
“We’ve got to tell the Bureau about this. These guys clearly are bad. One of them, at least, has a multiple-entry visa to the US. We've got to tell the FBI,” Mark Rossini, a member of Alec Station, has recalled discussing with his colleagues. “[But the CIA] said to me, ‘No, it’s not the FBI’s case, not the FBI’s jurisdiction.’”
moar
https://www.rt.com/news/574490-cia-dirty-deeds-nine-eleven/
>seethe. Seethe, baby, seethe.
hey echo chamber shill, find new words please. this is too stupid, even for you.
kek
you just confirmed you´re the echo chamber shill idiot
kek
still stuck on that (you) thing, can´t find the answer why anons like to get (you)s from baker
you have no idea, you´re only contribution is spam, that´s why
you truly are deeply stupid
kek
what an idiot
and why would I give a fuck about a (you) from you, or vice versa
kek
you really don ´t have a clue, do you
>flexing your "rank" as baker.
wft?
kek, you´re so lost, what on earth are you trying to communicate??
oh, and I just got a (you) from the baker btw, nice.
you´ll never get one, your only contribution is spam
it´s more lame than you know
you in here pretending to be an anon, and you have no clue why anons get (you)s from the bakers, and why we like it, . none whatsoever
…or prove it right now, answer the questiong.
well, answer the question then, all anons know the answer
for what contribution do anons get (you)s from the baker?
you can´t answer, because you don´t know, your only contribution is spam
fedboi
>i'm not jumping through hoops for you,
KEK
can´t answer a simply question to prove you´re not a shill
your glow is nuclear
>upvotes
it´s not about the (you) itself but for the contribution
really, even a stupid shill should have figured out the answer by now
kek
oh, you shills are so pathetic
the answer is out now
anons get (you)s for notables
why did you not know that, shill?
kek
pathetic
why didn´t you know that anons get (you)s for notables?
because your contribution is only spam and bs, you´ve never put something notable on in here
in case you´re too stupid to realize it (likely), you´ve been outing yourself as a shill for …how long now? months? ….thinking we like (you)s from some weird reasons, upvotes or whatever
they´re really not sending their best, are they? (yes, they are)
I´m calling out the shills, if you havent noticed.
anons get (you)s when they contribute something that ends up in the notable list, that´s where the (you)s show.
>But did they have the chutzpah to pilot or were they there to get the hardware on the plane
not sure
I remember in some old documentary (zeitgeist?) where at least many of the hijackers were show still alive.
don´t know about that.
I tell everyone teaching folks about 911 to focus first on wtc7 freefall speed in collapse, and then all the pentagon stuff
that seems to wake people up
>The "bld 7" puts people to sleep
nonsense, it´s physically impossible for wtc7 to fall in freefall speed unless it was "pulled down", which means Inside Job, however you try to slice it.
This is what wtc7 shows clearly, and in my own experience has been most effective in waking people up.
..and wtc7 couldn´t have been pulled unless bombs were planted
…which is impossible with that high security building, unless an inside job
yes, the bombs were planted beforehand, but terrorists couldn´t have done that because of security.
the freefall speed shows it was bombed, ergo an inside job.
watch the youtube documentry I posted, it´s the best one out there on this subject. worth the watch and good to show people.
>bld. "7" Salomon Bros Bld / Lehman Bros. Bld was a controlled demolition. No need for bombs
controlled demolition uses bombs to pull down buildings, and yes, it was a controlled demolition
just watch the documentary I posted, it goes into all of this in detail, and much more.
it´s full af engineers and architects teling their expert opinion
it really is the best documentry about all of this
and yeah, I think the 911 commission report doesn´t even mention wtc7(!!)
>the engineer and architect group is comped. Has been so forever.
Bullshit, and beside it´s their argument that count. Hard scientific facts.