The Vatican has a website.
they have a news service
they do radio broadcasts and post them on line in multiple languages.
who needs a blue check mark at twitter when they have their own news and media organizations.
so much upset about something so trivial as a phony checkmark on a website that tried to be a gate keeper.
Elon is right to say 'enough'
if they can afford this:
https://www.vatican.va/content/vatican/en.html
they can afford the small amount Elon wants.
>636f63
ah, ok.
for me anyone who automatically posts content when they aren't at the keyboard is a spammer.
but I have a low tolerance.
you can keep your halo.
"i feel it"
>554
positive shift of energy
request for believe in magic and 'feelings'
this is a shill push.
and it is not organic.
wrong
humans did it all.
they programmed something to implement it.
this is more "AI is all powerful" psy op.
it's called 'operant conditioning'
it's a technique in hypnosis.
someone says something.
something that you neer considered.
and suddenly (some) people start believing it and repeating it.
why do I call it out?
I guess because it's so obvious.
and I'm loose with my words. If it's not 'shilling' it's an attempt to drive the conversation: that means it is gate keeping.
I have no problem with you disagreeing with me, but what I find distasteful is when people argue semantics.
'tolerance break'?
I find 'toleranace' is a trigger word.
one ought to never tolerate some kinds of behavior in the way that liberals mean it.
if you mean that you're not going to put up with BS? well, that's just something that allows us to function.
but it's OK to say that kind of a thing in a conversation where you are able to fill in the details.
and I'm not asying that people don't feel stuff, new moon and ecclipse, various holidays, that's fine.
but when it's here, and it's about 'muh feels' and no one explains it, then I find it, what is the polite word? "inorganic"
so I test it by making a clinical statement and I expect a response.
you're giving a good one.
remember: you only need to 'not put up with' the stuff that strangers do if you or someone else is in immediate danger.
you can't be the enforcer at the market.
People don't want any one who is on a 'tolerance break' if you mean that you feel it's OK to suddenly speak freely to truculent strangers who are not hampering or hindering you in any way.
I was at the store and considering a purchase and a woman was like 'excuse me can I just get this, I just need this one thing' and I told her 'I just need this one thing too, and I was here first' so . . .
she didn't like it when I told her that 'next time you maybe can be a bit more patient'.
Was I 'out of line?'
I was terse, and I didn't let her walk all over me.
but I thought 'why did I make a point of that?'
and the answer was I just reacted because that type is always pushing themselves to the front of the line.
I was at a walmart and a woman with a full kart brought it up to the front of the line, and then walked away for about 15 seconds, came back and acted like she had been at the front of the line the whole time.
I didn't say anything but I wanted to.
I stopped myself because it really didn't matter.
she was being a jerk, she knew what she was doing, and I knew that my saying anything would cause a scene and I'd be the bad guy.
anyway 'tolerance break' , please clarify that and elucidate for the education of anon.
TY in advance.
I know that technology is held back.
there are lots of things that get held back.
but "AI" is supposed to be 'Artificial Intelligence' and to me a computer is not intelligent.
plus I don't think that any intelligence is every artificial.
It either is or it is not.
and I don't call groups of sensors and ladder logic arrays to control access 'intelligence' I call it 'sensor controlled robotic interlocking'